» Articles » PMID: 31187944

Mechanisms of Voice Control Related to Prosody in Autism Spectrum Disorder and First-degree Relatives

Overview
Journal Autism Res
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Jun 13
PMID 31187944
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Differences in prosody (e.g., intonation, rhythm) are among the most obvious language-related impairments in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and significantly impact communication. Subtle prosodic differences have also been identified in a subset of clinically unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with ASD, and may reflect genetic liability to ASD. This study investigated the neural basis of prosodic differences in ASD and first-degree relatives through analysis of feedforward and feedback control involved in the planning, production, self-monitoring, and self-correction of speech by using a pitch-perturbed auditory feedback paradigm during sustained vowel and speech production. Results revealed larger vocal response magnitudes to pitch-perturbed auditory feedback across tasks in ASD and ASD parent groups, with differences in sustained vowel production driven by parents who displayed subclinical personality and language features associated with ASD (i.e., broad autism phenotype). Both ASD and ASD parent groups exhibited increased response onset latencies during sustained vowel production, while the ASD parent group exhibited decreased response onset latencies during speech production. Vocal response magnitudes across tasks were associated with prosodic atypicalities in both individuals with ASD and their parents. Exploratory event-related potential (ERP) analyses in a subgroup of participants during the sustained vowel task revealed reduced P1 ERP amplitudes in the ASD group, with similar trends observed in parents. Overall, results suggest underdeveloped feedforward systems and neural attenuation in detecting audio-vocal feedback may contribute to ASD-related prosodic atypicalities. Importantly, results implicate atypical audio-vocal integration as a marker of genetic risk to ASD, evident in ASD and among clinically unaffected relatives. Autism Res 2019, 12: 1192-1210. © 2019 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: Previous research has identified atypicalities in prosody (e.g., intonation) in individuals with ASD and a subset of their first-degree relatives. In order to better understand the mechanisms underlying prosodic differences in ASD, this study examined how individuals with ASD and their parents responded to unexpected differences in what they heard themselves say to modify control of their voice (i.e., audio-vocal integration). Results suggest that disruptions to audio-vocal integration in individuals with ASD contribute to ASD-related prosodic atypicalities, and the more subtle differences observed in parents could reflect underlying genetic liability to ASD.

Citing Articles

Vocal tasks-based EEG and speech signal analysis in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a multimodal investigation.

Sharma Y, Singh B, Dhurandhar S Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(5):2387-2403.

PMID: 39555290 PMC: 11564584. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10096-y.


Perception and adaptation of receptive prosody in autistic adolescents.

Kurumada C, Rivera R, Allen P, Bennetto L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16409.

PMID: 39013983 PMC: 11252140. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66569-x.


Endophenotype trait domains for advancing gene discovery in autism spectrum disorder.

Mosconi M, Stevens C, Unruh K, Shafer R, Elison J J Neurodev Disord. 2023; 15(1):41.

PMID: 37993779 PMC: 10664534. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-023-09511-y.


Differences in speech articulatory timing and associations with pragmatic language ability in autism.

Lau J, Losh M, Speights M Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2023; 102.

PMID: 37484484 PMC: 10358876. DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102118.


Prosodic signatures of ASD severity and developmental delay in preschoolers.

Godel M, Robain F, Journal F, Kojovic N, Latreche K, Dehaene-Lambertz G NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):99.

PMID: 37248317 PMC: 10227036. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00845-4.


References
1.
Hickok G . Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13(2):135-45. PMC: 5367153. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3158. View

2.
BUCHWALD J, Erwin R, Van Lancker D, GUTHRIE D, Schwafel J, Tanguay P . Midlatency auditory evoked responses: P1 abnormalities in adult autistic subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 84(2):164-71. DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90021-3. View

3.
Murphy M, Bolton P, Pickles A, Fombonne E, Piven J, Rutter M . Personality traits of the relatives of autistic probands. Psychol Med. 2000; 30(6):1411-24. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799002949. View

4.
Lin I, Mochida T, Asada K, Ayaya S, Kumagaya S, Kato M . Atypical delayed auditory feedback effect and Lombard effect on speech production in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:510. PMC: 4585204. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00510. View

5.
Liu P, Chen Z, Jones J, Wang E, Chen S, Huang D . Developmental sex-specific change in auditory-vocal integration: ERP evidence in children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 124(3):503-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.08.024. View