» Articles » PMID: 31181789

Effect of Statin on Cancer Incidence: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jun 12
PMID 31181789
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Statins are reported to reduce the risk of cancer, but the results of various published studies have been contradictory. We carried out an umbrella review to provide an overview and understand the strength of evidence, extent of potential biases, and validity of claimed associations between the use of statins and cancer incidence. We comprehensively re-analyzed the data of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on associations between statin use and cancer incidence. We also assessed the strength of evidence of the re-analyzed outcomes, which were determined from the criteria including statistical significance of the p-value of random-effects, as well as fixed-effects meta-analyses, small study effects, between-study heterogeneity, and a 95% prediction interval. Using a conventional method to assess the significance of meta-analysis (p-value < 0.05), statins had a statistically significant effect on reducing cancer incidence in 10 of 18 types of cancer. When we graded the level of evidence, no cancer type showed convincing evidence, and four cancers (esophageal cancer, hematological cancer, leukemia, and liver cancer) showed suggestive evidence of a preventive effect. There was weak evidence of an association with six cancers, and no significance for the remaining eight cancers. None of the meta-analyses of RCTs on the association of statin and cancer incidence showed a statistical significance. Although there was a preventive effect of statin on cancer incidence in 10 of the 18 cancer types, the evidence supporting the use of statins to reduce cancer incidence was low. Therefore, the associations between statin use and cancer incidence should be carefully considered by clinicians.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: A Dangerous Liaison.

Newman A, Dalman J, Moore K Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2025; 45(3):359-371.

PMID: 39781742 PMC: 11864891. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.319863.


Statin exposure and risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li A, Jiang H, Jia Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1507739.

PMID: 39650188 PMC: 11624505. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1507739.


Exploring the Chemopreventive Effect of Medication on Gene Expression Linked to Colorectal Cancer: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Healthy Colon Mucosa.

Moratalla-Navarro F, Carreras-Torres R, Diez-Obrero V, Devall M, Obon-Santacana M, Diez-Villanueva A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39518949 PMC: 11547083. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111395.


Statins as anti-tumor agents: A paradigm for repurposed drugs.

Tripathi S, Gupta E, Galande S Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(5):e2078.

PMID: 38711272 PMC: 11074523. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.2078.


Metformin and statins reduce hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis C patients with failed antiviral therapy.

Tsai P, Huang C, Yeh M, Hsieh M, Kuo H, Hung C Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024; 30(3):468-486.

PMID: 38637957 PMC: 11261235. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0038.


References
1.
Berman N, Parker R . Meta-analysis: neither quick nor easy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002; 2:10. PMC: 122061. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-10. View

2.
Jakobisiak M, Golab J . Potential antitumor effects of statins (Review). Int J Oncol. 2003; 23(4):1055-69. View

3.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss P, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004; 328(7454):1490. PMC: 428525. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490. View

4.
Nissen S, Tuzcu E, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela W, Tsai J . Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042000. View

5.
Ioannidis J . Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA. 2005; 294(2):218-28. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.2.218. View