» Articles » PMID: 31181375

His Bundle Has a Shorter Chronaxie Than Does the Adjacent Ventricular Myocardium: Implications for Pacemaker Programming

Overview
Journal Heart Rhythm
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Jun 11
PMID 31181375
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Strength-duration curves for permanent His bundle (HB) pacing are potentially important for pacemaker programming.

Objectives: We aimed to calculate strength-duration curves and chronaxies of the HB and of the adjacent right ventricular (RV) working myocardium and to analyze zones of selective HB capture and battery current drain when pacing at different pulse durations (PDs).

Methods: Consecutive patients with permanent HB pacing were studied. The RV and HB capture thresholds were assessed at several PDs. Battery current drain and zones of selective HB capture at PDs of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 1.0 ms were determined.

Results: In the whole group (N = 127), the HB chronaxie was shorter than the RV chronaxie. This difference was driven by patients with selective HB pacing (HB chronaxie 0.47 ms vs RV chronaxie 0.79 ms). The strength-duration curve for the HB had a lower rheobase and its steep portion started at shorter PDs, thus creating wider distance-zone of programmable selective HB pacing-between the HB and RV strength-duration curves at shorter PDs. The battery current drain was lower with pacing at PDs of 0.1-0.4 ms vs 1.0 ms. Chronaxie-adjusted PDs offered the lowest current drain.

Conclusion: For the first time, the strength-duration curves for permanent selective and nonselective HB pacing were determined. Selective HB capture and battery longevity can be promoted by shorter PDs (0.2 ms). Longer PDs (1.0 ms) offer greater safety margin for RV capture and may be preferable if simultaneous RV capture during HB pacing is desired.

Citing Articles

Energy Saving in Permanent Cardiac Pacing: Pulse Waveform and Charge Balancing Deserve Consideration.

Di Gregorio F, Marcantoni L, Mozzi A, Barbetta A, Zanon F Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001713 PMC: 11851791. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020194.


Conduction system pacing on track to replace CRT? Review of current evidence and prospects of conduction system pacing.

Moustafa A, Tang A, Khan H Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1220709.

PMID: 37649666 PMC: 10463741. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220709.


EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: executive summary. Endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS) and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).

Burri H, Jastrzebski M, Cano O, Curila K, De Pooter J, Huang W Europace. 2023; 25(4):1237-1248.

PMID: 37061850 PMC: 10105857. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad044.


EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).

Burri H, Jastrzebski M, Cano O, Curila K, De Pooter J, Huang W Europace. 2023; 25(4):1208-1236.

PMID: 37061848 PMC: 10105878. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad043.


Troubleshooting Programming of Conduction System Pacing.

Bakelants E, Burri H Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021; 10(2):85-90.

PMID: 34401180 PMC: 8335852. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.16.