» Articles » PMID: 31177506

Impact of Plan-Level Access Restrictions on Effectiveness of Biologics Among Patients with Rheumatoid or Psoriatic Arthritis

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 10
PMID 31177506
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Novel disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can slow disease progression among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, some health plans require prior authorization (PA) or step therapy for access to treatments.

Objectives: This retrospective study compared treatment effectiveness among RA and PsA patients with and without plan-level access restrictions to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Medication adherence, a component of effectiveness, was also examined as a secondary outcome.

Methods: RA and PsA patients aged 18-64 years with one or more claims for subcutaneous bDMARDs between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015, with plan-level access data available, were identified within the IBM MarketScan claims database. The primary outcome was treatment effectiveness assessed during the 12 months following the first qualifying DMARD claim. Multivariate modeling examined the correlation between access restrictions and treatment effectiveness. Medication adherence during the 12-month follow-up period was also compared between patients with and without access restrictions.

Results: Among 3993 RA and 1713 PsA patients, 34.2 and 35.1%, respectively, had access restrictions, of whom 70.5 and 78.9%, respectively, had plans with step therapy. Compared with patients whose plans did not require step therapy, odds of treatment effectiveness were 19% lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.98; p  = 0.033) for RA patients and 27% lower (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.98; p = 0.037) for PsA patients in plans with step therapy. Differences in effectiveness were driven by differences in medication adherence, the odds of which were 19% lower (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96; p = 0.014) among RA patients and 29% lower (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94; p = 0.017) among PsA patients in plans with versus without step therapy.

Conclusions: Compared with patients in plans without access restrictions or with PA only, RA and PsA patients in insurance plans with step therapy had lower odds of treatment effectiveness, mainly due to lower odds of adhering to treatment, during the 12 months following subcutaneous bDMARD initiation.

Citing Articles

Analyzing the Benefits and Costs of the Safe Step Act on Patients, Physicians, and Insurers.

Shan D, Greenzaid J, Greene E, Feldman S J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2024; 9(3):115-120.

PMID: 39301213 PMC: 11361492. DOI: 10.1177/24755303241253203.


Reduction of biologic pricing following biosimilar introduction: Analysis across 57 countries and regions, 2012-19.

Chen H, Yemeke T, Ozawa S PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0304851.

PMID: 38843282 PMC: 11156405. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304851.


Decision Impact Analysis to Measure the Influence of Molecular Signature Response Classifier Testing on Treatment Selection in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Curtis J, Strand V, Golombek S, Karpouzas G, Zhang L, Wong A Rheumatol Ther. 2023; 11(1):61-77.

PMID: 37948030 PMC: 10796853. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00618-1.


Patient and Clinician Challenges with Anticholinergic Step Therapy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Review.

Dmochowski R, Newman D, Rovner E, Zillioux J, Malik R, Ackerman A Adv Ther. 2023; 40(11):4741-4757.

PMID: 37725308 PMC: 10567877. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02625-8.


Real-World Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Initiating First- Versus Second- or Later-Line Treatment With Ocrelizumab.

Geiger C, Sheinson D, To T, Jones D, Bonine N Neurol Ther. 2023; 12(5):1709-1728.

PMID: 37458897 PMC: 10444704. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00523-3.


References
1.
Iannone F, Fanizzi R, Scioscia C, Anelli M, Lapadula G . Body mass does not affect the remission of psoriatic arthritis patients on anti-TNF-α therapy. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012; 42(1):41-4. DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2012.715186. View

2.
Husted J, Gladman D, Farewell V, Cook R . Health-related quality of life of patients with psoriatic arthritis: a comparison with patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 45(2):151-8. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200104)45:2<151::AID-ANR168>3.0.CO;2-T. View

3.
Curtis J, Chastek B, Becker L, Harrison D, Collier D, Yun H . Further evaluation of a claims-based algorithm to determine the effectiveness of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis using commercial claims data. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013; 15(2):404. PMC: 3672715. DOI: 10.1186/ar4161. View

4.
Gottenberg J, Brocq O, Perdriger A, Lassoued S, Berthelot J, Wendling D . Non-TNF-Targeted Biologic vs a Second Anti-TNF Drug to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Insufficient Response to a First Anti-TNF Drug: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 316(11):1172-1180. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.13512. View

5.
Birnbaum H, Pike C, Kaufman R, Marynchenko M, Kidolezi Y, Cifaldi M . Societal cost of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the US. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 26(1):77-90. DOI: 10.1185/03007990903422307. View