» Articles » PMID: 31175420

Outcomes of Colorectal Stents when Used As a Bridge to Curative Resection in Obstruction Secondary to Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 9
PMID 31175420
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Up to 25% of colorectal cancers present with bowel obstruction. Metal stents (MS) can provide a bridge to surgery by relieving obstruction and allowing the subject's condition to improve pre-operatively.

Methods: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) is a database of all NHS funded secondary care episodes in England. Subjects admitted with bowel obstruction secondary to colorectal cancer without metastases were identified and subdivided into two groups: MS insertion prior to surgery and surgery only. Due to demographic differences between the groups, propensity score matching was used to analyse procedural outcomes, mortality and readmission within 30 days in left-sided cancers based upon age, sex and Charlson co-morbidity score.

Results: Over 10 years, 4571 subjects were identified; 401 received a MS and 4170 underwent surgery only. Median age of MS subjects was 71 (IQR 62-79) years; 226 (56.4%) were male. Median age of surgery-only subjects was 73 (64-81); 2165 (51.9%) were male. Following propensity matching 375 MS and 375 surgery-only subjects remained; MS had fewer readmissions within 30 days (28 (7.5%) versus 44 (11.7%), p = 0.047), fewer respiratory complications (< 6 (< 1.5%) versus 28 (7.5%), p < 0.001), lower stoma rates (49 (13.1%) versus 159 (42.4%), p < 0.001) and higher rates of laparoscopic surgery (154 (41.1%) versus 25 (6.7%), p < 0.001). Mortality was lower in the MS group at 30 days (7 (1.9%) versus 33 (8.8%), p < 0.001) and 1 year (37 (9.9%) versus 71 (19.0%), p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In subjects presenting with obstructing colorectal cancer outcomes including respiratory complications, readmission and mortality appear to be better in subjects undergoing MS as a bridge to surgery compared to surgery alone.

Citing Articles

Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution.

Khoo M, Koh F, Sivarajah S, Ho L, Aw D, Chong C Ann Coloproctol. 2024; 40(6):555-563.

PMID: 39107229 PMC: 11701448. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00738.0105.


Obstructing colorectal cancer: a population-based review of colonic stenting in Queensland, Australia.

Keogh C, Moore J, Cossio D, Smith N, Clark D Ann Coloproctol. 2024; 40(3):268-275.

PMID: 38946096 PMC: 11362761. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00640.0091.


Self-expandable metallic stents as a bridge to surgery in obstructive right- and left-sided colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

Kim E, Park J, Kim B, Son I, Kim J, Kim J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):438.

PMID: 36624310 PMC: 9829682. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27767-1.

References
1.
Sebastian S, Johnston S, Geoghegan T, Torreggiani W, Buckley M . Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stenting in malignant colorectal obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99(10):2051-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40017.x. View

2.
Nuttall M, van der Meulen J, Emberton M . Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59(3):265-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.015. View

3.
Zhao X, Liu B, Zhao E, Wang J, Cai M, Xia Z . The safety and efficiency of surgery with colonic stents in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014; 2014:407325. PMC: 4053219. DOI: 10.1155/2014/407325. View

4.
Ng H, Yule M, Twoon M, Binnie N, Aly E . Current outcomes of emergency large bowel surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015; 97(2):151-6. PMC: 4473394. DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925059679. View

5.
Suen M, Zahid A, Young J, Rodwell L, Solomon M, Young C . How to decide to undertake a randomized, controlled trial of stent or surgery in colorectal obstruction. Surgery. 2015; 157(6):1137-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.022. View