» Articles » PMID: 31168436

Development of High Oleic Peanut Lines Through Marker-assisted Introgression of Mutant Alleles and Its Fatty Acid Profiles Under Open-field and Controlled Conditions

Overview
Journal 3 Biotech
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Jun 7
PMID 31168436
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Peanut is one of the most important oilseed crops grown worldwide. In this study, the mutant alleles conferring high oleic (HO) content are introgressed into an elite Indian cultivar GPBD4 which is also resistant to the foliar fungal diseases like rust and late leaf spot (LLS). The allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) and cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS) assays were used for the marker-assisted backcross (MABC) approach and 64 HO introgression lines (ILs) were generated. These ILs were tested for the FA compositions under the glasshouse and field conditions. The oleic acid and linoleic acid contents in the ILs were recorded to be between 68.94-82.33% and 1.74-10.87%, respectively, under glasshouse and 67.04-81.71% and 2.00-15.66%, respectively, under field conditions. The increase in the oleic acid content of the ILs over its recurrent parent (RP) was recorded to the tune of 28.78-53.80% and 33.70-62.96% under glasshouse and field conditions, respectively, indicating the stable expression of gene in two different environments. On the contrary, linoleic acid showed 56.47-93.03% and 40.02-92.34% reduction in the ILs over its RP under glasshouse and field conditions, respectively. These ILs with a healthy FA profile can meet not only the nutritional requirements of a health-conscious society but also the industrial demands for better shelf life of oil and its products.

Citing Articles

Marker-assisted introgression to improve the oleic acid content in the TMV 7 groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) variety suitable for the oil industry.

Vargheese R, Saravanan S, Hepziba S, Kumari S, Pushpam A, Kanagarajan S BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):733.

PMID: 39085764 PMC: 11290006. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05387-9.


Does improved oleic acid content due to marker-assisted introgression of mutant alleles in peanuts alter its mineral and vitamin composition?.

Kamdar J, Jasani M, Chandrashekar A, Janila P, Pandey M, Georrge J Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:942617.

PMID: 35968125 PMC: 9372547. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.942617.


Identification of novel QTLs for late leaf spot resistance and validation of a major rust QTL in peanut ( L.).

Ahmad S, Nawade B, Sangh C, Mishra G, Bosamia T, T R 3 Biotech. 2020; 10(10):458.

PMID: 33088655 PMC: 7527388. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02446-4.


Translational genomics for achieving higher genetic gains in groundnut.

Pandey M, Pandey A, Kumar R, Nwosu C, Guo B, Wright G Theor Appl Genet. 2020; 133(5):1679-1702.

PMID: 32328677 PMC: 7214508. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03592-2.

References
1.
Jung S, Swift D, Sengoku E, Patel M, Teule F, Powell G . The high oleate trait in the cultivated peanut [Arachis hypogaea L.]. I. Isolation and characterization of two genes encoding microsomal oleoyl-PC desaturases. Mol Gen Genet. 2000; 263(5):796-805. DOI: 10.1007/s004380000244. View

2.
Jung S, Powell G, Moore K, Abbott A . The high oleate trait in the cultivated peanut [Arachis hypogaea L]. II. Molecular basis and genetics of the trait. Mol Gen Genet. 2000; 263(5):806-11. DOI: 10.1007/s004380000243. View

3.
Andersen P, Gorbet D . Influence of year and planting date on fatty acid chemistry of high oleic acid and normal peanut genotypes. J Agric Food Chem. 2002; 50(5):1298-305. DOI: 10.1021/jf0113171. View

4.
Cuc L, Mace E, Crouch J, Quang V, Long T, Varshney R . Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite markers and their application for diversity assessment in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol. 2008; 8:55. PMC: 2416452. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-55. View

5.
Yu S, Pan L, Yang Q, Min P, Ren Z, Zhang H . Comparison of the Delta(12) fatty acid desaturase gene between high-oleic and normal-oleic peanut genotypes. J Genet Genomics. 2008; 35(11):679-85. DOI: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60090-9. View