» Articles » PMID: 31166153

Glycemic Control, Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease, and Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials and Intensive Glucose Control Trials

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 6
PMID 31166153
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background The value of glycemic control and preexisting cardiovascular disease in determining the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes mellitus is uncertain. Intensive glucose control trials suggest that the 9% lower risk of MACE associated with intensive glycemic control, as compared with conventional glycemic control, is only driven by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without cardiovascular disease at baseline. Methods and Results We did a meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials dividing patients with or without preexisting cardiovascular disease; we found that the lower risk of MACE is confined to patients with cardiovascular disease at baseline. Compared with placebo, the use of both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors was associated with a significant 14% lower MACE risk in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and with a nonsignificant 2% higher MACE risk in those without preexisting cardiovascular disease ( P for interaction=0.021). The meta-regression analysis of all 12 trials demonstrated a significant ( P=0.002) association between reductions of glycated hemoglobin in glycated hemoglobin A. Accordingly, the reduction of MACE expected if all cardiovascular outcome trials had achieved a 0.9% glycated hemoglobin reduction would have been 33%. Routine clinical care data complement the results of cardiovascular outcome trials but with some differences: the lower risk of MACE with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use is evident in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without preexisting cardiovascular disease. Conclusions Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists should be included in the therapeutic plan of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt cardiovascular disease, with due attention paid to improvement of glycemic control, which may amplify their benefit on MACE.

Citing Articles

The effectiveness of a multi-domain electronic feedback report on the performance of quality indicators for chronic conditions: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial in general practice.

Jager L, Markun S, Grischott T, Senn O, Rosemann T, Burgstaller J PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0314360.

PMID: 39570965 PMC: 11581287. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314360.


Glycaemic control is still central in the hierarchy of priorities in type 2 diabetes management.

Khunti K, Zaccardi F, Amod A, Aroda V, Aschner P, Colagiuri S Diabetologia. 2024; 68(1):17-28.

PMID: 39155282 PMC: 11663178. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06254-w.


Managing sepsis and septic shock in an endothelial glycocalyx-friendly way: from the viewpoint of surviving sepsis campaign guidelines.

Iba T, Maier C, Helms J, Ferrer R, Thachil J, Levy J Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):64.

PMID: 38658435 PMC: 11043313. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01301-6.


SGLT2 Inhibitors - The New Standard of Care for Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Protection in Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.

Seidu S, Alabraba V, Davies S, Newland-Jones P, Fernando K, Bain S Diabetes Ther. 2024; 15(5):1099-1124.

PMID: 38578397 PMC: 11043288. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01550-5.


Potential Mediators for Treatment Effects of Novel Diabetes Medications on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes: A Meta-Regression Analysis.

Rodriguez-Valadez J, Tahsin M, Masharani U, Park M, Hunink M, Yeboah J J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(4):e032463.

PMID: 38362889 PMC: 11010086. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032463.


References
1.
Zelniker T, Wiviott S, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich E, Bonaca M . SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2018; 393(10166):31-39. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X. View

2.
Hernandez A, Green J, Janmohamed S, DAgostino Sr R, Granger C, Jones N . Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018; 392(10157):1519-1529. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X. View

3.
Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):W65-94. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. View

4.
Zoungas S, Arima H, Gerstein H, Holman R, Woodward M, Reaven P . Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017; 5(6):431-437. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30104-3. View

5.
Svanstrom H, Ueda P, Melbye M, Eliasson B, Svensson A, Franzen S . Use of liraglutide and risk of major cardiovascular events: a register-based cohort study in Denmark and Sweden. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; 7(2):106-114. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30320-6. View