» Articles » PMID: 31164962

Molecular Biomarkers and Precision Medicine in Colorectal Cancer: a Systematic Review of Health Economic Analyses

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jun 6
PMID 31164962
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An increased understanding of the biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has fuelled identification of biomarkers with potential to drive a stratified precision medicine care approach in this common malignancy. We conducted a systematic review of health economic assessments of molecular biomarkers (MBMs) and their employment in patient stratification in CRC. Our analysis revealed scenarios where health economic analyses have been applied to evaluate the cost effectiveness of MBM-guided clinical interventions: (i) evaluation of Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) status to identify patients susceptible to 5-Fluouracil toxicity; (ii) determination of Uridine 5'-diphospho- glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 gene (UGT1A1) polymorphism status to help guide irinotecan treatment; (iii) assessment of RAS/RAF mutational status to stratify patients for chemotherapy or Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) therapy and (iv) multigene expression analysis (Oncotype Dx) to identify and spare non-responders the debilitating effects of particular chemotherapy interventions. Our findings indicate that Oncotype Dx is cost-effective in high income settings within specific price points, by limiting treatment toxicity in CRC patients. DPYD status testing may also be cost effective in certain settings to avoid specific 5-FU toxicities post treatment. In contrast, current research does not support UGT1A1 polymorphism status as a cost-effective guide to irinotecan dosing, while the health economic evidence to support testing of KRAS/NRAS mutational status and chemo/EGFR therapy choice was inconclusive, despite its widespread adoption in CRC treatment management. However, we also show that there is a paucity of high-quality cost-effectiveness studies to support clinical application of precision medicine approaches in CRC.

Citing Articles

Very Early Health Technology Assessment for Potential Predictive Biomarkers in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Otten L, Buma A, Piet B, Ter Heine R, van den Heuvel M, Retel V Pharmacoecon Open. 2025; .

PMID: 39875696 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-025-00557-3.


Assessing the Therapeutic Impacts of HAMLET and FOLFOX on BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: A Study of Cancer Cell Survival and Mitochondrial Dynamics In Vitro and Ex Vivo.

Zilinskas J, Stukas D, Jasukaitiene A, Zievyte I, Balion Z, Sapauskiene J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(1).

PMID: 38256402 PMC: 10818271. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010142.


Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach.

Henderson R, French D, Stewart E, Smart D, Idica A, Redmond S J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023; 16(1):84.

PMID: 37408046 PMC: 10320864. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9.


Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancer: where do we currently stand?-A systematic review.

Magyar C, Vashist Y, Stroka D, Kim-Fuchs C, Berger M, Banz V J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(10):8039-8050.

PMID: 36966394 PMC: 10374781. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04689-z.


CDX2 Biomarker Testing and Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: An Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Alarid-Escudero F, Schrag D, M Kuntz K Value Health. 2022; 25(3):409-418.

PMID: 35227453 PMC: 8894795. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.019.


References
1.
Lu C, Huang C, Wu I, Tsai H, Ma C, Yeh Y . Clinical Implication of UGT1A1 Promoter Polymorphism for Irinotecan Dose Escalation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Bevacizumab Combined with FOLFIRI in the First-line Setting. Transl Oncol. 2015; 8(6):474-9. PMC: 4700286. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.002. View

2.
Qi W, Shen Z, Tang L, Yao Y . Does the addition of targeted biological agents to first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer increase complete response? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16(9):O300-7. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12647. View

3.
Yeh Y, Tsai H, Huang C, Wang J, Lin Y, Tang H . Prospective analysis of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism for irinotecan dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI as the first-line setting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016; 17:46. PMC: 4727397. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1153-3. View

4.
Semrad T, Kim E . Molecular testing to optimize therapeutic decision making in advanced colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016; 7(Suppl 1):S11-20. PMC: 4783624. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.094. View

5.
Alberts S, Yu T, Behrens R, Renfro L, Srivastava G, Soori G . Comparative economics of a 12-gene assay for predicting risk of recurrence in stage II colon cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014; 32(12):1231-43. PMC: 4244576. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0207-1. View