» Articles » PMID: 31164634

Inhibition of PP2A Activity by HO During Mitosis Disrupts Nuclear Envelope Reassembly and Alters Nuclear Shape

Overview
Journal Exp Mol Med
Date 2019 Jun 6
PMID 31164634
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many types of cancer cells exhibit abnormal nuclear shapes induced by various molecular changes. However, whether reactive oxygen species (ROS) induce nuclear deformation has not been fully addressed. Here, we show that hydrogen peroxide (HO) treatment induced concentration-dependent alterations in nuclear shape that were abolished by pretreatment with the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine or by catalase overexpression. Interestingly, treatment with HO induced nuclear shape alterations significantly more frequently in mitotic cells than in asynchronous cells, suggesting that HO mainly affects nuclear envelope disassembly and/or reassembly processes. Because protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A) activity is reported to be involved in nuclear envelope reassembly during mitosis, we investigated the possible involvement of PP2A. Indeed, HO reduced the activity of PP2A, an effect that was mimicked by the PP1 and PP2A inhibitor okadaic acid. Moreover, overexpression of PP2A but not PP1 or PP4 partially rescued HO-induced alterations in nuclear shape, indicating that the decrease in PP2A activity induced by HO is specifically involved in the observed nuclear shape alterations. We further show that treatment of mitotic cells with HO induced the mislocalization of BAF (barrier-to-autointegration factor), a substrate of PP2A, during telophase. This effect was associated with Lamin A/C mislocalization and was rescued by PP2A overexpression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HO preferentially affects mitotic cells through PP2A inhibition, which induces the subsequent mislocalization of BAF and Lamin A/C during nuclear envelope reassembly, leading to the formation of an abnormal nuclear shape.

Citing Articles

Akt3 links mitochondrial function to the regulation of Aurora B and mitotic fidelity.

Hough Z, Nasehi F, Corum D, Norris R, Foley A, Muise-Helmericks R PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0315751.

PMID: 40048438 PMC: 11884723. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315751.


Native lamin A/C proteomes and novel partners from heart and skeletal muscle in a mouse chronic inflammation model of human frailty.

Elzamzami F, Samal A, Arun A, Dharmaraj T, Prasad N, Rendon-Jonguitud A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1240285.

PMID: 37936983 PMC: 10626543. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1240285.


Nuclear envelope assembly relies on CHMP-7 in the absence of BAF-LEM-mediated hole closure.

Barger S, Penfield L, Bahmanyar S J Cell Sci. 2023; 136(21).

PMID: 37795681 PMC: 10668030. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.261385.


Nuclear envelope assembly relies on CHMP-7 in the absence of BAF-LEM-mediated hole closure.

Barger S, Penfield L, Bahmanyar S bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37461528 PMC: 10350047. DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.06.547980.


TSC22D4 interacts with Akt1 to regulate glucose metabolism.

Demir S, Wolff G, Wieder A, Maida A, Buhler L, Brune M Sci Adv. 2022; 8(42):eabo5555.

PMID: 36269831 PMC: 9586482. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo5555.


References
1.
Furukawa K, Sugiyama S, Osouda S, Goto H, Inagaki M, Horigome T . Barrier-to-autointegration factor plays crucial roles in cell cycle progression and nuclear organization in Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116(Pt 18):3811-23. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00682. View

2.
Nam H, Kim S, Lee M, Lee B, Hara T, Saya H . The ERK-RSK1 activation by growth factors at G2 phase delays cell cycle progression and reduces mitotic aberrations. Cell Signal. 2008; 20(7):1349-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.03.008. View

3.
Zink D, Fischer A, Nickerson J . Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4(9):677-87. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1430. View

4.
Capo-Chichi C, Cai K, Testa J, Godwin A, Xu X . Loss of GATA6 leads to nuclear deformation and aneuploidy in ovarian cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 29(17):4766-77. PMC: 2725711. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00087-09. View

5.
Acilan C, Potter D, Saunders W . DNA repair pathways involved in anaphase bridge formation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007; 46(6):522-31. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20425. View