Online Information on Dysmenorrhoea: An Evaluation of Readability, Credibility, Quality and Usability

Overview

Journal J Clin Nurs

Specialty Nursing

Date 2019 Jun 5

PMID 31162870

Citations 10

Authors

Jordan Lovett

Candice Gordon

Shelby Patton

Chen X Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims And Objectives: To evaluate online information on dysmenorrhoea, including readability, credibility, quality and usability.

Background: Menstrual pain impacts 45%-95% of women of reproductive age globally and is the leading cause of school and work absences among women. Women often seek online information on dysmenorrhoea; however, little is known about the information quality.

Design: This was a descriptive study to evaluate online information on dysmenorrhoea.

Methods: We imitated search strategies of the general public. Specifically, we employed the three most popular search engines worldwide-Google, Yahoo and Bing-and used lay search terms, "period pain" and "menstrual cramps." We screened 60 web pages. Following removal of duplicates and irrelevant web pages, 25 met the eligibility criteria. Two team members independently evaluated the included web pages using standardised tools. Readability was evaluated with the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade formulas; credibility, quality and usability were evaluated with established tools. We followed the STROBE checklist for reporting this study.

Results: For readability, the mean Flesch-Kincaid level was 10th grade. For credibility, 8% of web pages referenced scientific literature and 28% stated the author's name and qualifications. For quality, no web page employed user-driven content production; 8% of web pages referenced evidence-based guidelines, 32% of web pages had accurate content, and 4% of web pages recommended shared decision-making. Most web pages were interactive and included nontextual information. Some nontextual information was inaccurate.

Conclusion: Online information on dysmenorrhoea has generally low readability, mixed credibility and variable quality.

Relevance To Clinical Practice: Strategies to improve health information on dysmenorrhoea include avoiding complex terms, incorporating visual aids, presenting evidence-based information and developing a decision aid to support shared decision-making. Healthcare providers should be aware of the problematic health information that individuals are exposed to and provide education about how to navigate online health information.

Citing Articles

Assessing the language availability, readability, suitability and comprehensibility of heat-health messaging content on health authority webpages and online resources in Canada.

Tetzlaff E, Janetos K, Wagar K, Mourad F, Gorman M, Gallant V PEC Innov. 2025; 6:100368.

PMID: 39896057 PMC: 11786110. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100368.

Seeking and encountering online information for menstrual health: a qualitative study among adolescent schoolgirls in Gianyar Regency and Denpasar City, Bali, Indonesia.

Suttor H, Yamayanti K, Astiti N, Dewi T, Chenhall R, Ansariadi A Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025; 31(4):2445936.

PMID: 39773261 PMC: 11792152. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2445936.

High-Quality eHealth Websites for Information on Endometriosis: Systematic Search.

Sirohi D, Ng C, Bidargaddi N, Slater H, Parker M, Hull M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e48243.

PMID: 38198205 PMC: 10809066. DOI: 10.2196/48243.

Online information on chronic pain in 3 countries: an assessment of readability, credibility, and accuracy.

Basnet R, Mendez D, Lugo-Gonzalez I, OHagan E, OKeeffe M, Sharma S Pain Rep. 2023; 8(4):e1078.

PMID: 37342519 PMC: 10278708. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001078.

Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.

Vagenes H, Pranic S Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023; 21(1):44.

PMID: 37189154 PMC: 10184410. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01100-x.

References

Pattanittum P, Kunyanone N, Brown J, Sangkomkamhang U, Barnes J, Seyfoddin V . Dietary supplements for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 3:CD002124. PMC: 7387104. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002124.pub2. View

Davis L, Kennedy S, Moore J, Prentice A . Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (3):CD001019. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001019.pub2. View

Marjoribanks J, Ayeleke R, Farquhar C, Proctor M . Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (7):CD001751. PMC: 6953236. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3. View

Wong L . Premenstrual syndrome and dysmenorrhea: urban-rural and multiethnic differences in perception, impacts, and treatment seeking. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011; 24(5):272-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.03.009. View

McKearney T, McKearney R . The quality and accuracy of internet information on the subject of ear tubes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77(6):894-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.021. View

Chen C, Groves D, Miller W, Carpenter J . Big Data and Dysmenorrhea: What Questions Do Women and Men Ask About Menstrual Pain?. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018; 27(10):1233-1241. PMC: 6205038. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6732. View

Aleksova J, Kuczynska-Burggraf M, Ranasinha S, Vincent A . Information on early menopause: is the internet the place to search?. Climacteric. 2017; 20(3):248-255. DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1301920. View

Proctor M, Smith C, Farquhar C, Stones R . Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; (1):CD002123. PMC: 8078521. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002123. View

Janssen E, Rijkers A, Hoppenbrouwers K, Meuleman C, DHooghe T . Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(5):570-82. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt016. View

10.

Burnett M, Lemyre M . No. 345-Primary Dysmenorrhea Consensus Guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017; 39(7):585-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.023. View

11.

Sandvik H . Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence. BMJ. 1999; 319(7201):29-32. PMC: 28152. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.29. View

12.

Eysenbach G, Kohler C . How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002; 324(7337):573-7. PMC: 78994. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573. View

13.

Iacovides S, Avidon I, Baker F . What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(6):762-78. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv039. View

14.

Chen C, Shieh C, Draucker C, Carpenter J . Reasons women do not seek health care for dysmenorrhea. J Clin Nurs. 2017; 27(1-2):e301-e308. PMC: 5746430. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13946. View

15.

Wei S, Chao H, Tu C, Li W, Low I, Chuang C . Changes in functional connectivity of pain modulatory systems in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Pain. 2015; 157(1):92-102. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000340. View

16.

Stossel L, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R . Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27(9):1165-70. PMC: 3514986. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0. View

17.

Subasinghe A, Happo L, Jayasinghe Y, Garland S, Gorelik A, Wark J . Prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhoea, and management options reported by young Australian women. Aust Fam Physician. 2016; 45(11):829-834. View

18.

Tanaka E, Momoeda M, Osuga Y, Rossi B, Nomoto K, Hayakawa M . Burden of menstrual symptoms in Japanese women - an analysis of medical care-seeking behavior from a survey-based study. Int J Womens Health. 2013; 6:11-23. PMC: 3869918. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S52429. View

19.

McGovern C, Cheung C . Yoga and Quality of Life in Women with Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018; 63(4):470-482. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12729. View

20.

CHARNOCK D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R . DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 53(2):105-11. PMC: 1756830. DOI: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105. View