» Articles » PMID: 31161353

Effect of Collagenase-gelatinase Ratio on the Mechanical Properties of a Collagen Fibril: a Combined Monte Carlo-molecular Dynamics Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Jun 5
PMID 31161353
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Loading in cartilage is supported primarily by fibrillar collagen, and damage will impair the function of the tissue, leading to pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Damage is initiated by two types of matrix metalloproteinases, collagenase and gelatinase, that cleave and denature the collagen fibrils in the tissue. Experimental and modeling studies have revealed insights into the individual contributions of these two types of MMPs, as well as the mechanical response of intact fibrils and fibrils that have experienced random surface degradation. However, no research has comprehensively examined the combined influences of collagenases and gelatinases on collagen degradation nor studied the mechanical consequences of biological degradation of collagen fibrils. Such preclinical examinations are required to gain insights into understanding, treating, and preventing degradation-related cartilage pathology. To develop these insights, we use sequential Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations to probe the effect of enzymatic degradation on the structure and mechanics of a single collagen fibril. We find that the mechanical response depends on the ratio of collagenase to gelatinase-not just the amount of lost fibril mass-and we provide a possible mechanism underlying this phenomenon. Overall, by characterizing the combined influences of collagenases and gelatinases on fibril degradation and mechanics at the preclinical research stage, we gain insights that may facilitate the development of targeted interventions to prevent the damage and loss of mechanical integrity that can lead to cartilage pathology.

Citing Articles

Fibrosis and Hepatocarcinogenesis: Role of Gene-Environment Interactions in Liver Disease Progression.

Banerjee A, Farci P Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201329 PMC: 11354981. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168641.


Biological functions and applications of LncRNAs in the regulation of the extracellular matrix in osteoarthritis.

Shi D, Mei Y, Hao W, Li J, Liu S, Lin X Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 11:1330624.

PMID: 38259516 PMC: 10800956. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1330624.


Computational Analysis and Optimization of Geometric Parameters for Fibrous Scaffold Design.

Parsons R, Sestito J, Luke B ACS Omega. 2022; 7(45):41449-41460.

PMID: 36406516 PMC: 9670901. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05234.


An in vitro investigation to understand the synergistic role of MMPs-1 and 9 on articular cartilage biomechanical properties.

Mixon A, Savage A, Bahar-Moni A, Adouni M, Faisal T Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14409.

PMID: 34257325 PMC: 8277889. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93744-1.


Allosteric Communications between Domains Modulate the Activity of Matrix Metalloprotease-1.

Kumar L, Nash A, Harms C, Planas-Iglesias J, Wright D, Klein-Seetharaman J Biophys J. 2020; 119(2):360-374.

PMID: 32585130 PMC: 7376139. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.06.010.


References
1.
Malemud C . Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in health and disease: an overview. Front Biosci. 2005; 11:1696-701. DOI: 10.2741/1915. View

2.
Clark I, Swingler T, Sampieri C, Edwards D . The regulation of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008; 40(6-7):1362-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.006. View

3.
Collier I, Legant W, Marmer B, Lubman O, Saffarian S, Wakatsuki T . Diffusion of MMPs on the surface of collagen fibrils: the mobile cell surface-collagen substratum interface. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24029. PMC: 3164694. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024029. View

4.
Giannandrea M, Parks W . Diverse functions of matrix metalloproteinases during fibrosis. Dis Model Mech. 2014; 7(2):193-203. PMC: 3917240. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.012062. View

5.
Laasanen M, Toyras J, Korhonen R, Rieppo J, Saarakkala S, Nieminen M . Biomechanical properties of knee articular cartilage. Biorheology. 2002; 40(1-3):133-40. View