» Articles » PMID: 31157034

Electronic Medication Reconciliation in Hospitals: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacy
Date 2019 Jun 4
PMID 31157034
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is recognised as a multiprofessional process for the prevention of medication discrepancies. The goal of this study is to evaluate the available electronic medication reconciliation (eMedRec) tools and their effect on unintended discrepancies that occur in hospital institutions.

Method: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the ClinicalTrials.gov website and four other Chinese databases were searched for relevant studies starting from their inception through October 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using the nine standard criteria of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (EPOC) and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software.

Results: A total of 13 studies (three randomised controlled trials and 10 non-randomised controlled trials) were identified. Meta-analysis results demonstrated a reduced number of medications with unintended discrepancies (relative risk (RR)=1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55 to 2.21), while no statistically significant differences were observed in the number of patients with unintended medication discrepancies (RR=2.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 12.73). Common discrepancies included medication omission, dose discrepancy, and frequency discrepancy. We found that the clinical impact of medication discrepancy was mild. A total of 12 electronic tools were reported and were mostly integrated into the hospital's information system. However, the usability, user adherence, and user satisfaction were found to lack sufficient evidence.

Conclusion: eMedRec was shown to reduce the incidence of medication with unintended discrepancies and improve medication safety. However, the electronic tools are diversified and the effects on other outcomes still require a comprehensive evaluation.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017067528.

Citing Articles

Electronic pharmaceutical record for best possible medication history at preoperative evaluation to prevent postoperative adverse events: a quasi-experimental study.

Chapuis C, Bosson J, Bardet J, Lepelley M, Sourd D, Roustit M BMJ Open Qual. 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 40032596 PMC: 11877192. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003022.


Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tools Aimed at Healthcare Professionals to Support Medication Reconciliation: a Systematic Review.

Ciudad-Gutierrez P, Del Valle-Moreno P, Lora-Escobar S, Guisado-Gil A, Alfaro-Lara E J Med Syst. 2023; 48(1):2.

PMID: 38055124 PMC: 10700201. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-023-02008-0.


Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.

Alqenae F, Steinke D, Carson-Stevens A, Keers R Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023; 14:20420986231154365.

PMID: 36949766 PMC: 10026140. DOI: 10.1177/20420986231154365.


What works in medication reconciliation: an on-treatment and site analysis of the MARQUIS2 study.

Schnipper J, Reyes Nieva H, Yoon C, Mallouk M, Mixon A, Rennke S BMJ Qual Saf. 2023; 32(8):457-469.

PMID: 36948542 PMC: 11046420. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014806.


A National Modified Delphi Consensus Process to Prioritize Experiences and Interventions for Antipsychotic Medication Deprescribing Among Adult Patients With Critical Illness.

Jaworska N, Makuk K, Krewulak K, Niven D, Ismail Z, Burry L Crit Care Explor. 2022; 4(12):e0806.

PMID: 36506828 PMC: 9722588. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000806.


References
1.
Nickerson A, MacKinnon N, Roberts N, Saulnier L . Drug-therapy problems, inconsistencies and omissions identified during a medication reconciliation and seamless care service. Healthc Q. 2005; 8 Spec No:65-72. DOI: 10.12927/hcq..17667. View

2.
Mekonnen A, Abebe T, McLachlan A, Brien J . Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16:112. PMC: 4994239. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0353-9. View

3.
Schnipper J, Hamann C, Ndumele C, Liang C, Carty M, Karson A . Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application and process redesign on potential adverse drug events: a cluster-randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(8):771-80. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.51. View

4.
Cadwallader J, Spry K, Morea J, Russ A, Duke J, Weiner M . Design of a medication reconciliation application: facilitating clinician-focused decision making with data from multiple sources. Appl Clin Inform. 2013; 4(1):110-25. PMC: 3644819. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-12-RA-0057. View

5.
Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen T . The medication reconciliation process and classification of discrepancies: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 82(3):645-58. PMC: 5338112. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13017. View