» Articles » PMID: 31156773

Failure of Dermal Allograft Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Assessment

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Jun 4
PMID 31156773
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Massive retracted rotator cuff tears represent a therapeutic dilemma, particularly in the young and middle-aged patients who are not appropriate for a reverse total shoulder replacement. Interposition grafting using human dermal allograft offers an alternative treatment.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent interposition grafting using human dermal allograft between December 2013 and May 2015 for massive rotator cuff tears at our tertiary referral center was performed. Preoperative and 6 month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments were performed in all patients, with postoperative graft integrity being the primary outcome measure. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Oxford shoulder score, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

Results: The mean age at the time of follow-up was 54 years. On MRI, 84% of grafts were seen to have failed at 6 months. Strength was grossly reduced on the operative side when supraspinatus and subscapularis were tested; despite this, Constant score (mean, 48.2) was comparable to that in the previous reports. DASH and Oxford scores were a mean of 24.94 and 37.16, respectively.

Conclusions: Based on these results, in particular the MRI findings, we cannot advocate the use of dermal allograft as an interposition graft for the repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Citing Articles

The Clinical Application of Gel-Based Composite Scaffolds in Rotator Cuff Repair.

Tharakan S, Hadjiargyrou M, Ilyas A Gels. 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 39851973 PMC: 11764754. DOI: 10.3390/gels11010002.


Primary Rotator Cuff Bridging Reconstruction Shows Better Clinical and Radiographic Results Than Revision Bridging Reconstruction.

Karpyshyn J, Sparavalo S, Ma J, King J, Wong I Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(1):100869.

PMID: 38318394 PMC: 10839609. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100869.


Clinical Outcomes of Interposition Graft Versus Superior Capsular Reconstruction in Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Baek S, Shin M, Kim T, Im J, Oh K, Chung S Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(9):23259671211022241.

PMID: 34527751 PMC: 8435932. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211022241.


Bridging Allograft Reconstruction Is Superior to Maximal Repair for the Treatment of Chronic, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Wong I, Sparavalo S, King J, Coady C Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49(12):3173-3183.

PMID: 34494901 PMC: 8485417. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211039846.


Arthroscopic Knotless Rotator Cuff Repair With Decellularized Dermal Allograft Augmentation: The "Canopy" Technique.

Hirahara A, Andersen W, Dooney T Arthrosc Tech. 2020; 9(11):e1797-e1803.

PMID: 33294343 PMC: 7695626. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.08.003.


References
1.
Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J . The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(4):505-15. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00006. View

2.
Prickett W, Teefey S, Galatz L, Calfee R, Middleton W, Yamaguchi K . Accuracy of ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff in shoulders that are painful postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(6):1084-9. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00016. View

3.
Millstein E, Snyder S . Arthroscopic evaluation and management of rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 34(4):507-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(03)00095-6. View

4.
Sclamberg S, Tibone J, Itamura J, Kasraeian S . Six-month magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of large and massive rotator cuff repairs reinforced with porcine small intestinal submucosa. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(5):538-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.005. View

5.
Audenaert E, Van Nuffel J, Schepens A, Verhelst M, Verdonk R . Reconstruction of massive rotator cuff lesions with a synthetic interposition graft: a prospective study of 41 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(4):360-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0689-7. View