» Articles » PMID: 31154869

In Vitro Models for Thrombogenicity Testing of Blood-recirculating Medical Devices

Overview
Specialties Pharmacology
Radiology
Date 2019 Jun 4
PMID 31154869
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Blood-recirculating medical devices, such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenators (ECMO), and hemodialyzers, are commonly used to treat or improve quality of life in patients with cardiac, pulmonary, and renal failure, respectively. As part of their regulatory approval, guidelines for thrombosis evaluation in pre-clinical development have been established. testing evaluates a device's potential to produce thrombosis markers in static and dynamic flow loops.

Areas Covered: This review focuses on static and dynamic models to assess thrombosis in blood-recirculating medical devices. A summary of key devices is followed by a review of molecular markers of contact activation. Current thrombosis testing guidance documents, ISO 10993-4, ASTM F-2888, and F-2382 will be discussed, followed by analysis of their application to testing models.

Expert Opinion: In general, researchers have favored models to thoroughly evaluate thrombosis, limiting evaluation to hemolysis. studies are not standardized and it is often difficult to compare studies on similar devices. As blood-recirculating devices have advanced to include wearable and implantable artificial organs, expanded guidelines standardizing testing are needed to identify the thrombotic potential without excessive use of resources during pre-clinical development.

Citing Articles

Platelet Adhesion and Activation in an ECMO Thrombosis-on-a-Chip Model.

Goh T, Gao L, Singh J, Totaro R, Carey R, Yang K Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(30):e2401524.

PMID: 38757670 PMC: 11321669. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202401524.


Bivalirudin-hydrogel coatings of polyvinyl chloride on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for anticoagulation.

Gao W, Shen H, Chang Y, Tang Q, Li T, Sun D Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 10:1301507.

PMID: 38162136 PMC: 10754995. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1301507.


Preclinical evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions.

Frisch E, Clavier L, Belhamdi A, Vrana N, Lavalle P, Frisch B Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1193204.

PMID: 37576997 PMC: 10416115. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193204.


Strategies for surface coatings of implantable cardiac medical devices.

Coronel-Meneses D, Sanchez-Trasvina C, Ratera I, Mayolo-Deloisa K Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1173260.

PMID: 37256118 PMC: 10225971. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1173260.


Semi-Quantitative Method of Assessing the Thrombogenicity of Biomaterials Intended for Long-Term Blood Contact.

Gawlikowski M, Major R, Mika B, Komorowski D, Janiczak K, Tkacz E Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 36614378 PMC: 9821258. DOI: 10.3390/ma16010038.


References
1.
Harmand M, Briquet F . In vitro comparative evaluation under static conditions of the hemocompatibility of four types of tubing for cardiopulmonary bypass. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(17):1561-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00051-4. View

2.
Gartner M, Wilhelm C, Gage K, Fabrizio M, Wagner W . Modeling flow effects on thrombotic deposition in a membrane oxygenator. Artif Organs. 2000; 24(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06384.x. View

3.
Kawahito K, Adachi H, Ino T . Platelet activation in the gyro C1E3 centrifugal pump: comparison with the terumo capiox and the Nikkiso HPM-15. Artif Organs. 2000; 24(11):889-92. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06639.x. View

4.
Maroudas N . Adhesion and spreading of cells on charged surfaces. J Theor Biol. 1975; 49(2):417-24. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90182-4. View

5.
Wang D, Ji J, Gao C, Yu G, Feng L . Surface coating of stearyl poly(ethylene oxide) coupling-polymer on polyurethane guiding catheters with poly(ether urethane) film-building additive for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(12):1549-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00311-2. View