» Articles » PMID: 31153977

Retrieval of Individual Patient Data Depended on Study Characteristics: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Jun 3
PMID 31153977
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of providing a financial incentive to authors of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to obtain individual patient data (IPD).

Study Design And Setting: Parallel-group RCT with authors identified in the RCTs eligible for two systematic reviews. The authors were randomly allocated to the intervention (financial incentive with several contact approaches) or control group (using the same contact approaches). Studied outcomes are proportion of authors who provided IPD, time to obtain IPD, and completeness of IPD received.

Results: Of the 129 authors contacted, 37 authors suggested or contacted a person or funder providing relevant details or showed interest to collaborate, whereas 45 authors directed us to contact a person or funder, lacked resources or time, did not have ownership or approval to share the IPD, or claimed IPD was too old. None of the authors shared their IPD. We contacted 17 sponsors and received two complete IPD datasets from one sponsor. The time to obtain IPD was >1 year after a sponsor's positive response. Common barriers included study identification, data ownership, limited data access, and required IPD licenses.

Conclusion: IPD sharing may depend on study characteristics, including funding type, study size, study risk of bias, and treatment effect, but not on providing a financial incentive.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for severe agitation in real-world emergency settings: protocol of individual-participant-data network meta-analysis.

Siafis S, Wu H, Nomura N, Schneider-Thoma J, Bighelli I, Lorenz C Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):205.

PMID: 39095865 PMC: 11295517. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02623-z.


The optimal healthy ranges of thyroid function defined by the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Xu Y, Derakhshan A, Hysaj O, Wildisen L, Ittermann T, Pingitore A Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023; 11(10):743-754.

PMID: 37696273 PMC: 10866328. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00227-9.


Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Mayo-Wilson E, Qureshi R, Li T Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):67.

PMID: 37061724 PMC: 10105415. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02234-0.


An Introduction to Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.

Veroniki A, Seitidis G, Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos A, Mavridis D Neurology. 2023; 100(23):1102-1110.

PMID: 36797070 PMC: 10256124. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207078.


Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis.

Veroniki A, Seitidis G, Stewart L, Clarke M, Tudur-Smith C, Mavridis D BMJ Open. 2022; 12(11):e058034.

PMID: 36332950 PMC: 9639076. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058034.