» Articles » PMID: 31152188

Neural Entrainment is Associated with Subjective Groove and Complexity for Performed but Not Mechanical Musical Rhythms

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Jun 2
PMID 31152188
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Both movement and neural activity in humans can be entrained by the regularities of an external stimulus, such as the beat of musical rhythms. Neural entrainment to auditory rhythms supports temporal perception, and is enhanced by selective attention and by hierarchical temporal structure imposed on rhythms. However, it is not known how neural entrainment to rhythms is related to the subjective experience of groove (the desire to move along with music or rhythm), the perception of a regular beat, the perception of complexity, and the experience of pleasure. In two experiments, we used musical rhythms (from Steve Reich's Clapping Music) to investigate whether rhythms that are performed by humans (with naturally variable timing) and rhythms that are mechanical (with precise timing), elicit differences in (1) neural entrainment, as measured by inter-trial phase coherence, and (2) subjective ratings of the complexity, preference, groove, and beat strength of rhythms. We also combined results from the two experiments to investigate relationships between neural entrainment and subjective perception of musical rhythms. We found that mechanical rhythms elicited a greater degree of neural entrainment than performed rhythms, likely due to the greater temporal precision in the stimulus, and the two types only elicited different ratings for some individual rhythms. Neural entrainment to performed rhythms, but not to mechanical ones, correlated with subjective desire to move and subjective complexity. These data, therefore, suggest multiple interacting influences on neural entrainment to rhythms, from low-level stimulus properties to high-level cognition and perception.

Citing Articles

Measuring self-similarity in empirical signals to understand musical beat perception.

Lenc T, Lenoir C, Keller P, Polak R, Mulders D, Nozaradan S Eur J Neurosci. 2025; 61(2):e16637.

PMID: 39853878 PMC: 11760665. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16637.


Physiological Entrainment: A Key Mind-Body Mechanism for Cognitive, Motor and Affective Functioning, and Well-Being.

Barbaresi M, Nardo D, Fagioli S Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851371 PMC: 11763407. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010003.


Neural dynamics of predictive timing and motor engagement in music listening.

Zalta A, Large E, Schon D, Morillon B Sci Adv. 2024; 10(10):eadi2525.

PMID: 38446888 PMC: 10917349. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2525.


Meaning-making and creativity in musical entrainment.

Schiavio A, Witek M, Stupacher J Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1326773.

PMID: 38235276 PMC: 10792053. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1326773.


Neural synchronization is strongest to the spectral flux of slow music and depends on familiarity and beat salience.

Weineck K, Wen O, Henry M Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36094165 PMC: 9467512. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.75515.


References
1.
Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung T, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E . Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science. 2002; 295(5555):690-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1066168. View

2.
Patel A, Daniele J . An empirical comparison of rhythm in language and music. Cognition. 2002; 87(1):B35-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00187-7. View

3.
Delorme A, Makeig S . EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. View

4.
Hannon E, Trehub S . Tuning in to musical rhythms: infants learn more readily than adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(35):12639-43. PMC: 1194930. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504254102. View

5.
Will U, Eric Berg . Brain wave synchronization and entrainment to periodic acoustic stimuli. Neurosci Lett. 2007; 424(1):55-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.07.036. View