» Articles » PMID: 31151311

Orangutans' Comprehension of Zoo Keepers' Communicative Signals

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Jun 2
PMID 31151311
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Zoological institutions often encourage cooperative interactions between keepers and animals so as to promote animals' welfare. One useful technique has been conditioning training, whereby animals learn to respond to keepers' requests, which facilitates a number of, otherwise sensitive, daily routines. As various media have been used to convey keepers' instructions, the question remains of which modality is best to promote mutual understanding. Here, we explored this question with two captive female orangutans. In the first experiment, we compared orangutans' understanding of previously acquired instructions when those were performed with verbal signals only, gazes only, gestures only, and when all those modalities were combined. Our results showed that gestures were sufficient for successful comprehension by these two apes. In the second experiment, we asked whether this preference could be driven by the non-arbitrary relationship that gestures bear to what they refer to, through iconicity or pointing. Our results revealed that neither iconicity nor pointing helped the subjects comprehend the keepers' instructions. Our results indicate a preference for instructions given through gestural signals in two captive female orangutans, although its cause remains elusive. Future practice may encourage the use of gestures in communication between keepers and orangutans in general or potentially other animals.

Citing Articles

Great ape communication as contextual social inference: a computational modelling perspective.

Bohn M, Liebal K, Ona L, Tessler M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1859):20210096.

PMID: 35876204 PMC: 9310183. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0096.


Bo-NO-bouba-kiki: picture-word mapping but no spontaneous sound symbolic speech-shape mapping in a language trained bonobo.

Margiotoudi K, Bohn M, Schwob N, Taglialatela J, Pulvermuller F, Epping A Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1968):20211717.

PMID: 35105236 PMC: 8808101. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1717.

References
1.
Cartmill E, Byrne R . Orangutans modify their gestural signaling according to their audience's comprehension. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(15):1345-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.069. View

2.
van Schaik C, Burkart J, Damerius L, Forss S, Koops K, van Noordwijk M . The reluctant innovator: orangutans and the phylogeny of creativity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 371(1690). PMC: 4780526. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0183. View

3.
Ramakrishnan U, Coss R . Recognition of heterospecific alarm vocalizations by bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). J Comp Psychol. 2000; 114(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.3. View

4.
Fichtel C . Reciprocal recognition of sifaka ( Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) and redfronted lemur ( Eulemur fulvus rufus) alarm calls. Anim Cogn. 2003; 7(1):45-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-003-0180-0. View

5.
Scandurra A, Alterisio A, Aria M, Vernese R, DAniello B . Should I fetch one or the other? A study on dogs on the object choice in the bimodal contrasting paradigm. Anim Cogn. 2017; 21(1):119-126. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1145-z. View