» Articles » PMID: 31151158

DNA-Methylation-Based Detection of Urological Cancer in Urine: Overview of Biomarkers and Considerations on Biomarker Design, Source of DNA, and Detection Technologies

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Jun 2
PMID 31151158
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Changes in DNA methylation have been causally linked with cancer and provide promising biomarkers for detection in biological fluids such as blood, urine, and saliva. The field has been fueled by genome-wide characterization of DNA methylation across cancer types as well as new technologies for sensitive detection of aberrantly methylated DNA molecules. For urological cancers, urine is in many situations the preferred "liquid biopsy" source because it contains exfoliated tumor cells and cell-free tumor DNA and can be obtained easily, noninvasively, and repeatedly. Here, we review recent advances made in the development of DNA-methylation-based biomarkers for detection of bladder, prostate, renal, and upper urinary tract cancers, with an emphasis on the performance characteristics of biomarkers in urine. For most biomarkers evaluated in independent studies, there was great variability in sensitivity and specificity. We discuss issues that impact the outcome of DNA-methylation-based detection of urological cancer and account for the great variability in performance, including genomic location of biomarkers, source of DNA, and technical issues related to the detection of rare aberrantly methylated DNA molecules. Finally, we discuss issues that remain to be addressed to fully exploit the potential of DNA-methylation-based biomarkers in the clinic, including the need for prospective trials and careful selection of control groups.

Citing Articles

Urinary DNA-methylation and protein biomarkers identify urothelial carcinoma among other genitourinary diseases and cancer-free individuals.

Lang K, Kohler C, Wichert K, Deix T, Bartsch G, Sommer G J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):1061.

PMID: 39587670 PMC: 11590282. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05844-x.


Analysis of urine cell-free DNA in bladder cancer diagnosis by emerging bioactive technologies and materials.

Huang F, Di X, Bai M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1458362.

PMID: 39295845 PMC: 11408225. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1458362.


Unveiling the role of YARS1 in bladder cancer: A prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.

Wang Y, Wang J, Zhang L, He J, Ji B, Wang J J Cell Mol Med. 2024; 28(7):1-20.

PMID: 38506098 PMC: 10951887. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.18213.


Use of Multiple Machine Learning Approaches for Selecting Urothelial Cancer-Specific DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Urine.

Kohler C, Schork K, Turewicz M, Eisenacher M, Roghmann F, Noldus J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38255812 PMC: 10815677. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020738.


Biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma and their targeted therapies: a review.

Gupta S, Kanwar S Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023; 4(5):941-961.

PMID: 37970211 PMC: 10645469. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00175.


References
1.
Eads C, Danenberg K, Kawakami K, Saltz L, Blake C, Shibata D . MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(8):E32. PMC: 102836. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.8.e32. View

2.
Grunau C, Clark S, Rosenthal A . Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(13):E65-5. PMC: 55789. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.13.e65. View

3.
Goessl C, Muller M, Heicappell R, Krause H, Straub B, Schrader M . DNA-based detection of prostate cancer in urine after prostatic massage. Urology. 2001; 58(3):335-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01268-7. View

4.
Goessl C, Muller M, Heicappell R, Krause H, Miller K . DNA-based detection of prostate cancer in blood, urine, and ejaculates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 945:51-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03863.x. View

5.
Chan M, Chan L, Tang N, Tong J, Lo K, Lee T . Hypermethylation of multiple genes in tumor tissues and voided urine in urinary bladder cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8(2):464-70. View