» Articles » PMID: 31149009

Is Prophylactic Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Justified in All Patients? A Prospective Clinical Study of Patients 50 Years and Above

Overview
Journal Afr Health Sci
Date 2019 Jun 1
PMID 31149009
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molar is a contentious issue in dental practice.

Objective: To evaluate symptomatic impacted mandibular third molars in patients 50 years and above, and determine the burden of the impaction on the adjacent second molar.

Methods: This was a prospective clinical study over a three-year period. The diagnosis of impacted mandibular third molar and their associated pathology was made by clinical and radiological examination. The data obtained were age, sex, type of impaction, reason for surgical extraction, and the clinical condition of the adjacent second molar.

Results: Patients 50 years and above were 33.4%, and those with impaction 22.8%, while the symptomatic cases were in 18.4% patients. The age of the patients ranged from 52 to 84 years with male: female ratio, 2.3:1. In all the asymptomatic impactions, the adjacent second molars were disease-free, whereas 73.6% of the adjacent second molar related to symptomatic cases were asymptomatic (P=0.001).

Conclusion: This study showed that 15.9% of impactions in 18.4% of patients were symptomatic and required surgical extraction, whereas the burden of impaction on the adjacent second molar was 26.4%, and these required only preventive and restorative treatments.

Citing Articles

Is Surgical Removal of Asymptomatic Third Molars in the Horizontal III-C Position Advisable? A Pilot Study of Tomographic Evaluation.

Guilherme J, Bahia M, Medeiros Y, Kadooka M, Martins M, Leite I J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2024; 15(3):e4.

PMID: 39569361 PMC: 11574970. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15304.


The Accuracy of Bone Assessment Distal to Lower Second Molars Using Panoramic Radiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Assiri H, Estrugo-Devesa A, Rosello-Llabres X, Egido-Moreno S, Lopez-Lopez J Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38534297 PMC: 10969168. DOI: 10.3390/dj12030073.


Diagnostic Aspects of an Included Third Molar in an 88-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Miron M, Florea C, Lungeanu D, Todea C Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36140484 PMC: 9497960. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092082.


Pathologies associated with the mandibular third molar impaction.

Ye Z, Qian W, Wu Y, Yang C Sci Prog. 2021; 104(2):368504211013247.

PMID: 33913399 PMC: 10454952. DOI: 10.1177/00368504211013247.


Infections, NCDS, and the scourge of cyclones and Ebola in sub-Saharan Africa.

Tumwine J Afr Health Sci. 2019; 19(1):i-iv.

PMID: 31149013 PMC: 6531948. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.1.

References
1.
Kandasamy S, Rinchuse D . The wisdom behind third molar extractions. Aust Dent J. 2010; 54(4):284-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01152.x. View

2.
Song F, Landes D, Glenny A, Sheldon T . Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an assessment of published reviews. Br Dent J. 1997; 182(9):339-46. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809378. View

3.
Reitzik M, Lownie J, Cleaton-Jones P, Austin J . Experimental fractures of monkey mandibles. Int J Oral Surg. 1978; 7(2):100-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(78)80054-4. View

4.
Jun S, Kim C, Ahn J, Padwa B, Kwon J . Anatomical differences in lower third molars visualized by 2D and 3D X-ray imaging: clinical outcomes after extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42(4):489-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.12.005. View

5.
Friedman J . The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(9):1554-9. PMC: 1963310. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100271. View