» Articles » PMID: 31145523

Prediction of Significant Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline After Renal Unit Removal to Aid in the Clinical Choice Between Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with a Renal Mass and Normal Renal Function

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 May 31
PMID 31145523
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To develop a clinically applicable predictive model to quantitate the risk of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline to ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m after radical nephrectomy (RN) to better inform decisions between RN and partial nephrectomy (PN).

Patients And Methods: Our prospectively maintained kidney cancer registry was reviewed for patients with a preoperative eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m who underwent RN for a localized renal mass. New baseline renal function was indexed. We used multivariable logistic regression to develop a predictive nomogram and evaluated it using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Decision-curve analysis was used to assess the net clinical benefit.

Results: A total of 668 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 183 (27%) experienced a decline in eGFR to ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m . On multivariable analysis, increasing age (P = 0.001), female gender (P < 0.001), and increasing preoperative creatinine level (P < 0.001) were associated with functional decline. We constructed a predictive nomogram that included these variables in addition to comorbidities with a known association with kidney disease, but found that a simplified model excluding comorbidities was equally robust (cross-validated area under the ROC curve was 0.78). Decision-curve analysis showed the net clinical benefit at probabilities >~11%.

Conclusions: The decision to perform RN vs PN is multifaceted. We have provided a simple quantitative tool to help identify patients at risk of a postoperative eGFR of ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m , who may be stronger candidates for nephron preservation.

Citing Articles

Time trends in surgical provision and cancer-specific outcomes in patients with stage T2-3 kidney cancer: a SEER-based study.

Song Z, Xing J, Sun Z, Kang X, Li H, Ren G Front Surg. 2024; 11:1370702.

PMID: 38742149 PMC: 11089187. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1370702.


Predicting new-baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after donor nephrectomy: validation of a split renal function (SRF)-based formula.

Wong H, So W, Gauhar V, Goh B, Tiong H World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):50.

PMID: 38244074 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04759-4.


Practical Prediction of New Baseline Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy.

Rathi N, Attawettayanon W, Kazama A, Yasuda Y, Munoz-Lopez C, Lewis K Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 31(2):1402-1409.

PMID: 38006535 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14540-x.


Real-time estimation of nephron activity with a linear measurement system (RENAL-MS) predicts postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Schober J, Ginsburg K, Kutikov A, Cho E, Loecher M, Strauss D BJU Int. 2023; 133(2):206-213.

PMID: 37667554 PMC: 11279882. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16172.


Point of care parenchymal volume analyses to estimate split renal function and predict functional outcomes after radical nephrectomy.

Rathi N, Attawettayanon W, Yasuda Y, Lewis K, Roversi G, Shah S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6225.

PMID: 37069196 PMC: 10110585. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33236-6.


References
1.
van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A . A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2010; 59(4):543-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013. View

2.
Woldu S, Weinberg A, Korets R, Ghandour R, Danzig M, RoyChoudhury A . Who really benefits from nephron-sparing surgery?. Urology. 2014; 84(4):860-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.061. View

3.
Smaldone M, Egleston B, Uzzo R, Kutikov A . Does partial nephrectomy result in a durable overall survival benefit in the Medicare population?. J Urol. 2012; 188(6):2089-94. PMC: 3815608. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.099. View

4.
Mir M, Derweesh I, Porpiglia F, Zargar H, Mottrie A, Autorino R . Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies. Eur Urol. 2016; 71(4):606-617. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. View

5.
Fergany A, Hafez K, Novick A . Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol. 2000; 163(2):442-5. View