» Articles » PMID: 31143067

Alteration of the Esophageal Microbiota in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 May 31
PMID 31143067
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased in recent decades, and its 5-year survival rate is less than 20%. As a well-established precursor, patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) have a persistent risk of progression to EAC. Many researchers have already identified some factors that may contribute to the development of BE and EAC, and the identified risks include gastroesophageal reflux (GER), male sex, older age, central obesity, tobacco smoking, () eradication, and the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antibiotics. The human gut harbors trillions of microorganisms, the majority of which are bacteria. These microorganisms benefit the human host in many ways, such as helping in digestion, assisting in the synthesis of certain vitamins, promoting the development of the gastrointestinal immune system, regulating metabolism and preventing invasion by specific pathogens. In contrast, microbial dysbiosis may play important roles in various diseases, such as inflammation and cancers. The composition of the microbiota located in the normal esophagus is relatively conserved without distinct microbial preferences in the upper, middle and lower esophagus. Six major phyla constitute the esophageal microbiota, including , , , , and , similar to the oral microbiota. dominates the esophageal microbiota. However, the microbiota varies in different esophageal diseases compared to that in the healthy esophagus. The type I microbiota, which is primarily composed of gram-positive bacteria, is closely associated with the normal esophagus, while type II microbiota has enriched gram-negative bacteria and is mainly associated with the abnormal esophagus. These increased gram-negative anaerobes/microaerophiles include , , , , and , many of which are associated with BE. The microbial diversity in the esophagus is decreased in EAC patients, and is enriched compared to that in controls and BE patients. Furthermore, the microbiota may be associated with BE and EAC by interacting with their risk factors, including central obesity, GER, , administration of PPIs and antibiotics. Therefore, a large gap in research must be bridged to elucidate the associations among these factors. Some studies have already proposed several potential mechanisms by which the microbiota participates in human carcinogenesis by complicated interactions with the human host immune system and signaling pathways. The activation of the LPS-TLR4-NF-κB pathway may contribute to inflammation and malignant transformation. This exciting field of gastrointestinal microbiota allows us to unravel the mystery of carcinogenesis from another perspective. Further studies are needed to explore whether the microbiota changes before or after disease onset, to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis, and to find novel targets for prevention, diagnosis and therapy, which could offer more cost-effective and relatively safe choices.

Citing Articles

The role of the esophageal and intestinal microbiome in gastroesophageal reflux disease: past, present, and future.

Guan Y, Cheng H, Zhang N, Cai Y, Zhang Q, Jiang X Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1558414.

PMID: 40061946 PMC: 11885504. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1558414.


Causal association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sepsis, and the mediating role of gut bacterial abundance, a Mendelian randomization study.

Fu Z, Jiang Z, Zhao F, Gou T, Jiang L Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(8):e41631.

PMID: 39993106 PMC: 11857025. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041631.


From microbes to medicine: harnessing the power of the microbiome in esophageal cancer.

Liu X, Li B, Liang L, Han J, Mai S, Liu L Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1450927.

PMID: 39600698 PMC: 11588724. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1450927.


Intratumoral microbiota: a new force in the development and treatment of esophageal cancer.

Jing T, Tang D Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39455494 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03757-1.


Mechanistic Insights on Microbiota-Mediated Development and Progression of Esophageal Cancer.

Moe K, Tan K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409925 PMC: 11475040. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193305.


References
1.
Buskens C, van Rees B, Sivula A, Reitsma J, Haglund C, Bosma P . Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase 2 expression in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122(7):1800-7. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.33580. View

2.
Calatayud S, Garcia-Zaragoza E, Hernandez C, Quintana E, Felipo V, Esplugues J . Downregulation of nNOS and synthesis of PGs associated with endotoxin-induced delay in gastric emptying. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002; 283(6):G1360-7. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00168.2002. View

3.
Pei Z, Bini E, Yang L, Zhou M, Francois F, Blaser M . Bacterial biota in the human distal esophagus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(12):4250-5. PMC: 384727. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0306398101. View

4.
Kaufmann S, Schaible U . 100th anniversary of Robert Koch's Nobel Prize for the discovery of the tubercle bacillus. Trends Microbiol. 2005; 13(10):469-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.08.003. View

5.
Cook M, Wild C, Forman D . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the sex ratio for Barrett's esophagus, erosive reflux disease, and nonerosive reflux disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(11):1050-61. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi325. View