» Articles » PMID: 31138092

Optimizing Colour for Camouflage and Visibility Using Deep Learning: the Effects of the Environment and the Observer's Visual System

Overview
Date 2019 May 30
PMID 31138092
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Avoiding detection can provide significant survival advantages for prey, predators, or the military; conversely, maximizing visibility would be useful for signalling. One simple determinant of detectability is an animal's colour relative to its environment. But identifying the optimal colour to minimize (or maximize) detectability in a given natural environment is complex, partly because of the nature of the perceptual space. Here for the first time, using image processing techniques to embed targets into realistic environments together with psychophysics to estimate detectability and deep neural networks to interpolate between sampled colours, we propose a method to identify the optimal colour that either minimizes or maximizes visibility. We apply our approach in two natural environments (temperate forest and semi-arid desert) and show how a comparatively small number of samples can be used to predict robustly the most and least effective colours for camouflage. To illustrate how our approach can be generalized to other non-human visual systems, we also identify the optimum colours for concealment and visibility when viewed by simulated red-green colour-blind dichromats, typical for non-human mammals. Contrasting the results from these visual systems sheds light on why some predators seem, at least to humans, to have colouring that would appear detrimental to ambush hunting. We found that for simulated dichromatic observers, colour strongly affected detection time for both environments. In contrast, trichromatic observers were more effective at breaking camouflage.

Citing Articles

Through an animal's eye: the implications of diverse sensory systems in scientific experimentation.

Brebner J, Loconsole M, Hanley D, Vasas V Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2027):20240022.

PMID: 39016597 PMC: 11253838. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0022.


Adapting genetic algorithms for artificial evolution of visual patterns under selection from wild predators.

Briolat E, Hancock G, Troscianko J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0295106.

PMID: 38753609 PMC: 11098352. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295106.


A Review of Cervidae Visual Ecology.

Newman B, DAngelo G Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38338063 PMC: 10854973. DOI: 10.3390/ani14030420.


Little information loss with red-green color deficient vision in natural environments.

Foster D, Nascimento S iScience. 2023; 26(8):107421.

PMID: 37593460 PMC: 10428128. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107421.


Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments.

Hughes A, Briolat E, Arenas L, Liggins E, Stevens M Behav Ecol. 2023; 34(3):426-436.

PMID: 37192921 PMC: 10183209. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac114.


References
1.
Lathuiliere S, Mesejo P, Alameda-Pineda X, Horaud R . A Comprehensive Analysis of Deep Regression. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019; 42(9):2065-2081. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2910523. View

2.
Jacobs G . Evolution of colour vision in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1531):2957-67. PMC: 2781854. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0039. View

3.
Troscianko J, Wilson-Aggarwal J, Griffiths D, Spottiswoode C, Stevens M . Relative advantages of dichromatic and trichromatic color vision in camouflage breaking. Behav Ecol. 2018; 28(2):556-564. PMC: 5873837. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw185. View

4.
Morgan M, Adam A, Mollon J . Dichromats detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats. Proc Biol Sci. 1992; 248(1323):291-5. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0074. View

5.
Penacchio O, Lovell P, Cuthill I, Ruxton G, Harris J . Three-Dimensional Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Conceal Form. Am Nat. 2015; 186(4):553-63. DOI: 10.1086/682570. View