» Articles » PMID: 31137503

Comparison of Adrenal Tumor Size in Ultrasound Examinations with and Without the Use of a Contrast Agent

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 May 30
PMID 31137503
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients diagnosed with incidentally found adrenal tumors (incidentaloma) that do not meet the criteria for surgical treatment require follow-ups with repeated imaging. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of the measurements of the adrenal tumor size in ultrasound (US) with and without contrast in comparison to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI). Further, this study attempts to answer the question of whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can improve imaging accuracy and replace CT/MRI in the monitoring of patients with adrenal tumors. The retrospective analysis included 79 adult patients with adrenal incidentalomas not exceeding a dimension of 6 cm who underwent a CT or MRI scan, US, and CEUS with the use of SonoVue in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) projections and Doppler techniques. Tumor vascularization in CEUS was classified as follows: peripheral, peripheral-central, central, or poor. Of 79 adrenal tumors, 48.1% showed peripheral, 29.1% showed poor, 21.5% showed peripheral-central, and only 1.3% showed central vascularization. The median volume of tumors detected with CEUS (69.9 cm) was significantly higher than with US (44.5 cm) and CT or MRI (57.1 cm). The relative error of the adrenal volume with CEUS compared with CT or MRI was significantly higher than with standard US, regardless of the type of tumor vascularization. CEUS does not improve the accuracy of adrenal tumor size assessment regardless of the type of vascularization.

References
1.
Friedrich-Rust M, Schneider G, Bohle R, Herrmann E, Sarrazin C, Zeuzem S . Contrast-enhanced sonography of adrenal masses: differentiation of adenomas and nonadenomatous lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(6):1852-60. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3565. View

2.
Dietrich C, Ignee A, Barreiros A, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Sienz M, Bojunga J . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for imaging of adrenal masses. Ultraschall Med. 2009; 31(2):163-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109357. View

3.
Grossjohann H, Rappeport E, Jensen C, Svendsen L, Hillingso J, Hansen C . Usefulness of contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasound for tumor classification and tumor staging in the pancreatic head. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45(7-8):917-24. DOI: 10.3109/00365521003702718. View

4.
Dietrich C, Ignee A, Hocke M, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Greis C . Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol. 2011; 49(3):350-6. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245851. View

5.
Friedrich-Rust M, Glasemann T, Polta A, Eichler K, Holzer K, Kriener S . Differentiation between benign and malignant adrenal mass using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2011; 32(5):460-71. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273408. View