Consensus Statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus Statement

Background: Two randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach.

Methods: The International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017. The meeting was jointly organised by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), AO/Global Neuro and the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma. Discussions and voting were organised around six pre-specified themes: (1) primary DC for mass lesions, (2) secondary DC for intracranial hypertension, (3) peri-operative care, (4) surgical technique, (5) cranial reconstruction and (6) DC in low- and middle-income countries.

Results: The invited participants discussed existing published evidence and proposed consensus statements. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval.

Conclusions: In this manuscript, we present the final consensus-based recommendations. We have also identified areas of uncertainty, where further research is required, including the role of primary DC, the role of hinge craniotomy and the optimal timing and material for skull reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Baseline Characteristics Associated with Improved Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Primary Decompressive Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma Evacuation-A Retrospective Observational Study.

Vilcinis R, Juskys R, Piliponis L, Tamasauskas A Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005405 PMC: 11857178. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020288.

Post-craniectomy hydrocephalus in adult traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and outcome.

Bagherzadeh S, Bahari L, Roohollahi F Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):72.

PMID: 39841279 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03232-7.

RADAR - Radiomics on aSDH: predicting outcome with surface area.

Richter A, Wach J, Basaran A, Kasper J, Wilhelmy F, Wende T Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025; 167(1):21.

PMID: 39828870 PMC: 11743400. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06408-0.

Decompressive Craniectomy and Hinged Craniotomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Experience in Two Centers in a Middle-Income Country.

Gamboa-Onate C, Rincon-Arias N, Baldoncini M, Kehayov I, Capacho-Delgado Y, Monsalve M Korean J Neurotrauma. 2025; 20(4):252-261.

PMID: 39803346 PMC: 11711026. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e36.

Intraoperative variations in intra-axial brain tumor size after craniotomy: a prospective study with histopathological and tumor tissue composition correlation, introducing concepts of tumor expansion and tumor surfacing.

Kaushal-Deep S, Bhat A, Fayaz M, Scalia G, Robbani I, Wani M Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 48(1):9.

PMID: 39730869 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03157-7.

References

Kolias A, Adams H, Timofeev I, Czosnyka M, Corteen E, Pickard J . Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: developing the evidence base. Br J Neurosurg. 2016; 30(2):246-50. PMC: 4841020. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1159655. View

Kim B, Hong K, Park K, Park D, Chung Y, Kang S . Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013; 52(6):541-6. PMC: 3550422. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.6.541. View

El Ghoul W, Harrisson S, Belli A . Autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the trauma setting. Br J Neurosurg. 2014; 29(1):64-69. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2014.957157. View

Rubiano A, Carney N, Chesnut R, Puyana J . Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. Nature. 2015; 527(7578):S193-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature16035. View

Whitfield P, Patel H, Hutchinson P, Czosnyka M, Parry D, Menon D . Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy in the management of posttraumatic intracranial hypertension. Br J Neurosurg. 2002; 15(6):500-7. DOI: 10.1080/02688690120105110. View

Vilcinis R, Bunevicius A, Tamasauskas A . The Association of Surgical Method with Outcomes of Acute Subdural Hematoma Patients: Experience with 643 Consecutive Patients. World Neurosurg. 2017; 101:335-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.010. View

Li L, Kolias A, Guilfoyle M, Timofeev I, Corteen E, Pickard J . Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012; 154(9):1555-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1428-8. View

Malcolm J, Rindler R, Chu J, Chokshi F, Grossberg J, Pradilla G . Early Cranioplasty is Associated with Greater Neurological Improvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017; 82(3):278-288. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx182. View

Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, Shann F, Ditchfield M, Lewis E . A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001; 17(3):154-62. DOI: 10.1007/s003810000410. View

10.

Eberle B, Schnuriger B, Inaba K, Gruen J, Demetriades D, Belzberg H . Decompressive craniectomy: surgical control of traumatic intracranial hypertension may improve outcome. Injury. 2011; 41(9):894-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.023. View

11.

Chun H, Yi H . Efficacy and safety of early cranioplasty, at least within 1 month. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22(1):203-7. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f753bd. View

12.

Walcott B, Kwon C, Sheth S, Fehnel C, Koffie R, Asaad W . Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients. J Neurosurg. 2013; 118(4):757-62. DOI: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS121626. View

13.

Rutigliano D, Egnor M, Priebe C, McCormack J, Strong N, Scriven R . Decompressive craniectomy in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury with intractable elevated intracranial pressure. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41(1):83-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.010. View

14.

Wong G, Hung Y, Chong C, Yeung J, Chi-Ping Ng S, Rainer T . Assessing the neurological outcome of traumatic acute subdural hematoma patients with and without primary decompressive craniectomies. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2009; 106:235-7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-98811-4_44. View

15.

Chen S, Chen Y, Fang W, Huang D, Huang K, Tseng S . Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma. 2011; 71(6):1632-6. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182367b3c. View

16.

Ho C, Wang C, Lee K, Ng I, Ang B . Cerebral oxygenation, vascular reactivity, and neurochemistry following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008; 108(5):943-9. DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/5/0943. View

17.

Lazaridis C, Czosnyka M . Cerebral blood flow, brain tissue oxygen, and metabolic effects of decompressive craniectomy. Neurocrit Care. 2012; 16(3):478-84. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-012-9685-1. View

18.

Coulter I, Pesic-Smith J, Cato-Addison W, Khan S, Thompson D, Jenkins A . Routine but risky: a multi-centre analysis of the outcomes of cranioplasty in the Northeast of England. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156(7):1361-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2081-1. View

19.

Sawauchi S, Abe T . The effect of haematoma, brain injury, and secondary insult on brain swelling in traumatic acute subdural haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008; 150(6):531-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-007-1497-2. View

20.

Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, Steiner L, Hiler M, Smielewski P . Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care. 2006; 4(1):8-13. DOI: 10.1385/NCC:4:1:008. View