» Articles » PMID: 31130774

Extending the Simple View of Reading to Account for Variation Within Readers and Across Texts: The Complete View of Reading (CVR)

Overview
Date 2019 May 28
PMID 31130774
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study leverages advances in multivariate cross-classified random effects models to extend the Simple View of Reading to account for variation within readers and across texts, allowing for both the personalization of the reading function and the integration of the component skills and text and discourse frameworks for reading research. We illustrate the Complete View of Reading (CVR) using data from an intensive longitudinal design study with a large sample of typical ( 648) and struggling readers ( = 865) in middle school and using oral reading fluency as a proxy for comprehension. To illustrate the utility of the CVR, we present a model with cross-classified random intercepts for students and passages and random slopes for growth, Lexile difficulty, and expository text type at the student level. We highlight differences between typical and struggling readers and differences across students in different grades. The model illustrates that readers develop differently and approach the reading task differently, showing differential impact of text features on their fluency. To be complete, a model of reading must be able to reflect this heterogeneity at the person and passage level, and the CVR is a step in that direction. Implications for reading interventions and 21st century reading research in the era of "Big Data" and interest in phenotypic characterization are discussed.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneity in children's reading comprehension difficulties: A latent class approach.

James E, Thompson P, Bowes L, Nation K JCPP Adv. 2023; 3(4):e12177.

PMID: 38054059 PMC: 10694533. DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12177.


Evaluating the Simple View of Reading for Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Cole A, Chan E, Gaye F, Spiegel J, Soto E, Kofler M J Educ Psychol. 2023; 115(5):700-714.

PMID: 37873062 PMC: 10588461. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000806.


Executive Functions and Morphological Awareness Explain the Shared Variance Between Word Reading and Listening Comprehension.

Kim Y Sci Stud Read. 2023; 27(5):451-474.

PMID: 37600965 PMC: 10438421. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2023.2195112.


Educational Technology in Support of Elementary Students With Reading or Language-Based Disabilities: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial.

Hurwitz L, Vanacore K J Learn Disabil. 2022; 56(6):453-466.

PMID: 36519673 PMC: 10631285. DOI: 10.1177/00222194221141093.


Is the treatment weak or the test insensitive: Interrogating item difficulties to elucidate the nature of reading intervention effects.

Francis D, Kulesz P, Khalaf S, Walczak M, Vaughn S Learn Individ Differ. 2022; 97.

PMID: 36329992 PMC: 9629236. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102167.


References
1.
McNamara D . Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Can J Exp Psychol. 2001; 55(1):51-62. DOI: 10.1037/h0087352. View

2.
Storch S, Whitehurst G . Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(6):934-47. View

3.
Graesser A, McNamara D, Louwerse M, Cai Z . Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004; 36(2):193-202. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195564. View

4.
Lubke G, Muthen B . Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychol Methods. 2005; 10(1):21-39. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21. View

5.
Roehrig A, Petscher Y, Nettles S, F Hudson R, Torgesen J . Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. J Sch Psychol. 2008; 46(3):343-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.006. View