» Articles » PMID: 31129227

The Association Between Public Access Defibrillation and Outcome in Witnessed Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest with Shockable Rhythm

Overview
Journal Resuscitation
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2019 May 27
PMID 31129227
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is recommended globally that shocks by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) should be delivered immediately when a shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs. However, the actual time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and its impact on subsequent outcome has not been extensively investigated in real-world settings.

Methods: OHCA data from 2013 to 2015 were obtained from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. Bystander-witnessed OHCA patients with shockable rhythm who were shocked by public-access AED in public locations were included. The primary endpoint was 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome, and the association between time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and subsequent outcome was assessed.

Results: During the study period, 28% (2282/8126) of bystander-witnessed OHCA cases with shockable rhythm were shocked by public-access AED in public locations. The proportion of OHCA patients who were shocked by public-access AED within 5 min from collapse was 58% (1323/2282). Among these patients, the proportion of 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome was 62% (815/1317). The proportion significantly decreased with increased time from collapse to shock by public-access AED (48% for 6-10 min, 38% for 11-15 min, 30% for 16-20 min, and 7% for 21-25 min; p-for-trend <0.001), and no patient survived if shock delivery occurred more than 26 min after OHCA.

Conclusion: In Japan, earlier shock by public-access AED led to better outcome after bystander-witnessed OHCA with shockable rhythm in public locations. However, the proportion of OHCA patients who received early shock was still low in public locations.

Citing Articles

Gaps in Public Access Defibrillation: Analysis of International Legislation.

Kovoor J, Jerrow R, Cork S, Page G, Jui J, Chugh S JACC Adv. 2025; 4(2):101573.

PMID: 40021268 PMC: 11905156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101573.


Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Healthcare and Non-healthcare Workers in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Web-Based Questionnaire.

Matsumoto S, Tsugihashi Y, Akahane T, Nagoshi K, Akahane M Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76396.

PMID: 39867072 PMC: 11763473. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76396.


Comparative Efficacy of Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adult Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center.

Lee J, Jeong Y, Kim Y, Cho Y, Oh J, Jang H J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860519 PMC: 11765839. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020513.


The impact of smartphone-dispatched CPR-trained volunteers on OHCA outcomes is influenced by patient age.

Fabianek J, Felzen M, Riester K, Beckers S, Rossaint R, Schroder H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29671.

PMID: 39613946 PMC: 11607460. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81263-8.


Iso-lating optimal automated external defibrillator signage: An international survey.

Stretton B, Page G, Kovoor J, Zaka A, Gupta A, Bacchi S Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100798.

PMID: 39469138 PMC: 11513522. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100798.