» Articles » PMID: 31128842

Aging Effects of Motor Prediction on Protective Balance and Startle Responses to Sudden Drop Perturbations

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2019 May 27
PMID 31128842
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This pilot study investigated the effect of age on the ability of motor prediction during self-triggered drop perturbations (SLF) to modulate startle-like first trial response (FTR) magnitude during externally-triggered (EXT) drop perturbations. Ten healthy older (71.4 ± 1.44 years) and younger adults (26.2 ± 1.63 years) stood atop a moveable platform and received blocks of twelve consecutive EXT and SLF drop perturbations. Following the last SLF trial, participants received an additional EXT trial spaced 20 min apart to assess retention (EXT RTN) of any modulation effects. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded bilaterally over the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and tibialis anterior (TA). Whole-body kinematics and kinetic data were recorded. Stability in the antero-posterior direction was quantified using the margin of stability (MoS). Compared with EXT trials, both groups reduced SCM peak amplitude responses during SLF and EXT RTN trials. VL/BF and TA/MG coactivation were reduced during SLF FTR compared to EXT FTR (p < 0.05) with reduced peak vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) in both younger and older adults (p < 0.05). Older adults increased their MoS during SLF FTR compared to EXT FTR (p < 0.05). Both groups performed more eccentric work during SLF trials compared to EXT (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that abnormal startle effects with aging may interfere with balance recovery and increase risk of injury with external balance perturbations. Motor prediction may be used to acutely mitigate abnormal startle/postural responses with aging.

Citing Articles

A method for simulating forward falls and controlling impact velocity.

Borrelli J, Creath R, Rogers M MethodsX. 2023; 11:102399.

PMID: 37830002 PMC: 10565865. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102399.


The timing and amplitude of the muscular activity of the arms preceding impact in a forward fall is modulated with fall velocity.

Borrelli J, Creath R, Rogers M J Biomech. 2023; 150:111515.

PMID: 36867953 PMC: 10257944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111515.


Test-retest reliability of the FALL FIT system for assessing and training protective arm reactions in response to a forward fall.

Borrelli J, Creath R, Westlake K, Rogers M MethodsX. 2022; 9:101702.

PMID: 35518921 PMC: 9062354. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101702.


Protective arm movements are modulated with fall height.

Borrelli J, Creath R, Rogers M J Biomech. 2020; 99:109569.

PMID: 31898976 PMC: 7054927. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109569.

References
1.
Lafortune M, Lake M, Hennig E . Differential shock transmission response of the human body to impact severity and lower limb posture. J Biomech. 1996; 29(12):1531-7. View

2.
Torry M, Decker M, Ellis H, Shelburne K, Sterett W, Steadman J . Mechanisms of compensating for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency during gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(8):1403-12. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000135797.09291.71. View

3.
MacKinnon C, Bissig D, Chiusano J, Miller E, Rudnick L, Jager C . Preparation of anticipatory postural adjustments prior to stepping. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 97(6):4368-79. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01136.2006. View

4.
DeVita P, Skelly W . Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992; 24(1):108-15. View

5.
Mang D, Siegmund G, Inglis J, Blouin J . The startle response during whiplash: a protective or harmful response?. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012; 113(4):532-40. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00100.2012. View