» Articles » PMID: 31125548

Independent Replication of Motor Cortex and Cervical Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation to Promote Forelimb Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

Overview
Journal Exp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 May 25
PMID 31125548
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4-7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0-9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods.

Citing Articles

Chronic activation of corticospinal tract neurons after pyramidotomy injury enhances neither behavioral recovery nor axonal sprouting.

Wang Z, Brannigan M, Friedrich L, Blackmore M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39484429 PMC: 11527142. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.25.620314.


Timing-dependent synergies between motor cortex and posterior spinal stimulation in humans.

McIntosh J, Joiner E, Goldberg J, Greenwald P, Dionne A, Murray L J Physiol. 2024; 602(12):2961-2983.

PMID: 38758005 PMC: 11178459. DOI: 10.1113/JP286183.


Dual electrical stimulation at spinal-muscular interface reconstructs spinal sensorimotor circuits after spinal cord injury.

Zhou K, Wei W, Yang D, Zhang H, Yang W, Zhang Y Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):619.

PMID: 38242904 PMC: 10799086. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44898-9.


Modeling Electric Fields in Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation: A Clinical Perspective.

Guidetti M, Giannoni-Luza S, Bocci T, Pacheco-Barrios K, Bianchi A, Parazzini M Biomedicines. 2023; 11(5).

PMID: 37238953 PMC: 10216237. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11051283.


Recent progress and challenges in the treatment of spinal cord injury.

Tian T, Zhang S, Yang M Protein Cell. 2023; 14(9):635-652.

PMID: 36856750 PMC: 10501188. DOI: 10.1093/procel/pwad003.


References
1.
Gerasimenko Y, Ichiyama R, Lavrov I, Courtine G, Cai L, Zhong H . Epidural spinal cord stimulation plus quipazine administration enable stepping in complete spinal adult rats. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 98(5):2525-36. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00836.2007. View

2.
Ioannidis J . Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(8):e124. PMC: 1182327. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. View

3.
Bikson M, Truong D, Mourdoukoutas A, Aboseria M, Khadka N, Adair D . Modeling sequence and quasi-uniform assumption in computational neurostimulation. Prog Brain Res. 2015; 222:1-23. DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.08.005. View

4.
Kakulas B, Kaelan C . The neuropathological foundations for the restorative neurology of spinal cord injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015; 129 Suppl 1:S1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.01.012. View

5.
Asboth L, Friedli L, Beauparlant J, Martinez-Gonzalez C, Anil S, Rey E . Cortico-reticulo-spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(4):576-588. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0093-5. View