» Articles » PMID: 31124565

Case Epidemiology from the First Three Years of a Pilot Laboratory-based Surveillance System for Elevated Blood-lead Concentrations Among Children in England, 2014-17: Implications for Public Health Action

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 May 25
PMID 31124565
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Children incur lead toxicity even at low blood-lead concentrations (BLCs), and testing in England is opportunistic. We described epidemiology of cases notified to a passive laboratory-based surveillance system (SS), the Lead Poisoning in Children (LPIC) SS to inform opportunities to prevent lead exposure in children in England.

Methods: Surveillance population: children <16 years of age and resident in England during the reporting period September 2014-17. Case definition: children with BLC ≥0.48 μmol/l (10 μg/dl). We extracted case demographic/location data and linked it with laboratory, area-level population and socio-economic status (SES) data. We described case BLCs and calculated age-, gender- and SES-specific notification rates, and age-sex standardised regional notification rates.

Results: Between 2014 and 2017 there were 86 newly notified cases, giving an annual average notification rate of 2.76 per million children aged 0-15 years. Regionally, rates varied from 0.36 to 9.89 per million. Rates were highest in the most deprived quintile (5.38 per million), males (3.75 per million) and children aged 1-4 years (5.89 per million).

Conclusions: Males, children aged 1-4 years, and children in deprived areas may be at higher risk, and could be targeted for primary prevention. Varied regional notification rates suggest differences in clinician awareness of lead exposure and risk factors; guidelines standardising the indications for BLC-testing may assist secondary prevention.

Citing Articles

Potential Health Risks of Lead Exposure from Early Life through Later Life: Implications for Public Health Education.

Olufemi A, Mji A, Mukhola M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).

PMID: 36498077 PMC: 9741093. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316006.


'As safe as houses; the risk of childhood lead exposure from housing in England and implications for public health'.

Crabbe H, Verlander N, Iqbal N, Close R, White G, Leonardi G BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2052.

PMID: 36352379 PMC: 9644560. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14350-y.


Advancing Global Health through Environmental and Public Health Tracking.

Lauriola P, Crabbe H, Behbod B, Yip F, Medina S, Semenza J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6).

PMID: 32192215 PMC: 7142667. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061976.

References
1.
Kar-Purkayastha I, Balasegaram S, Sen D, Rehman A, Dargan P, Johnston D . Lead: ongoing public and occupational health issues in vulnerable populations: a case study. J Public Health (Oxf). 2011; 34(2):176-82. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr077. View

2.
Mithyantha R, Kneen R, McCann E, Gladstone M . Current evidence-based recommendations on investigating children with global developmental delay. Arch Dis Child. 2017; 102(11):1071-1076. PMC: 5738593. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311271. View

3.
Elliott P, Arnold R, Barltrop D, Thornton I, House I, Henry J . Clinical lead poisoning in England: an analysis of routine sources of data. Occup Environ Med. 2000; 56(12):820-4. PMC: 1757691. DOI: 10.1136/oem.56.12.820. View

4.
McNaughten B, Bourke T, Thompson A . Fifteen-minute consultation: the child with pica. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2017; 102(5):226-229. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312121. View

5.
Johnson L, Barlow P, Barratt R . Lead in paint--brushed aside?. J R Soc Health. 1984; 104(2):64-7. DOI: 10.1177/146642408410400206. View