» Articles » PMID: 31123952

Diurnal Variation in Mesophyll Conductance and Its Influence on Modelled Water-use Efficiency in a Mature Boreal Pinus Sylvestris Stand

Overview
Journal Photosynth Res
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 May 25
PMID 31123952
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mesophyll conductance (g) is a critical variable for the use of stable carbon isotopes to infer photosynthetic water-use efficiency (WUE). Although g is similar in magnitude to stomatal conductance (g), it has been measured less often, especially under field conditions and at high temporal resolution. We mounted an isotopic CO analyser on a field photosynthetic gas exchange system to make continuous online measurements of gas exchange and photosynthetic C discrimination (ΔC) on mature Pinus sylvestris trees. This allowed the calculation of g, g, net photosynthesis (A), and WUE. These measurements highlighted the asynchronous diurnal behaviour of g and g. While g declined from around 10:00, A declined first after 12:00, and g remained near its maximum until 16:00. We suggest that high g played a role in supporting an extended A peak despite stomatal closure. Comparing three models to estimate WUE from ∆C, we found that a simple model, assuming constant net fractionation during carboxylation (27‰), predicted WUE well, but only for about 75% of the day. A more comprehensive model, accounting explicitly for g and the effects of daytime respiration and photorespiration, gave reliable estimates of WUE, even in the early morning hours when WUE was more variable. Considering constant, finite g or g/g yielded similar WUE estimates on the diurnal scale, while assuming infinite g led to overestimation of WUE. These results highlight the potential of high-resolution g measurements to improve modelling of A and WUE and demonstrate that such g data can be acquired, even under field conditions.

Citing Articles

A comparative analysis of agronomic water-use efficiency and its proxy measures as derived from key morpho-physiological and supportive quantitative genetics attributes of perennial ryegrass under imposed drought.

Weerarathne L, Jahufer Z, Schaufele R, Lopez I, Matthew C Plant Environ Interact. 2023; 4(5):291-307.

PMID: 37829998 PMC: 10565840. DOI: 10.1002/pei3.10123.


Modeling the response of Norway spruce tree-ring carbon and oxygen isotopes to selection harvest on a drained peatland forest.

Tikkasalo O, Leppa K, Launiainen S, Peltoniemi M, Makipaa R, Rinne-Garmston K Tree Physiol. 2023; 44(1).

PMID: 37756632 PMC: 10993295. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpad119.


Stomatal, mesophyll and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis and their relationship with leaf structure over an elevation gradient in two conifers.

Guo J, Beverly D, Ewers B, Williams D Photosynth Res. 2023; 157(2-3):85-101.

PMID: 37212937 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-023-01022-0.


Quantitative effects of environmental variation on stomatal anatomy and gas exchange in a grass model.

Nunes T, Slawinska M, Lindner H, Raissig M Quant Plant Biol. 2023; 3:e6.

PMID: 37077975 PMC: 10095872. DOI: 10.1017/qpb.2021.19.


Estimation of intrinsic water-use efficiency from δC signature of C leaves: Assumptions and uncertainty.

Ma W, Yu Y, Wang X, Gong X Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1037972.

PMID: 36714771 PMC: 9877432. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1037972.


References
1.
Tarvainen L, Lutz M, Rantfors M, Nasholm T, Wallin G . Increased Needle Nitrogen Contents Did Not Improve Shoot Photosynthetic Performance of Mature Nitrogen-Poor Scots Pine Trees. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:1051. PMC: 4951524. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01051. View

2.
Warren C . Does growth temperature affect the temperature responses of photosynthesis and internal conductance to CO2? A test with Eucalyptus regnans. Tree Physiol. 2007; 28(1):11-9. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/28.1.11. View

3.
Wingate L, Ogee J, Burlett R, Bosc A, Devaux M, Grace J . Photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination and its relationship to the carbon isotope signals of stem, soil and ecosystem respiration. New Phytol. 2010; 188(2):576-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03384.x. View

4.
Klein T, Rotenberg E, Tatarinov F, Yakir D . Association between sap flow-derived and eddy covariance-derived measurements of forest canopy CO2 uptake. New Phytol. 2015; 209(1):436-46. DOI: 10.1111/nph.13597. View

5.
Keenan T, Hollinger D, Bohrer G, Dragoni D, Munger J, Schmid H . Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature. 2013; 499(7458):324-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature12291. View