» Articles » PMID: 31121960

Classification of Processing Damage in Sugar Beet () Seeds by Multispectral Image Analysis

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 May 25
PMID 31121960
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The pericarp of monogerm sugar beet seed is rubbed off during processing in order to produce uniformly sized seeds ready for pelleting. This process can lead to mechanical damage, which may cause quality deterioration of the processed seeds. Identification of the mechanical damage and classification of the severity of the injury is important and currently time consuming, as visual inspections by trained analysts are used. This study aimed to find alternative seed quality assessment methods by evaluating a machine vision technique for the classification of five damage types in monogerm sugar beet seeds. Multispectral imaging (MSI) was employed using the VideometerLab3 instrument and instrument software. Statistical analysis of MSI-derived data produced a model, which had an average of 82% accuracy in classification of 200 seeds in the five damage classes. The first class contained seeds with the potential to produce good seedlings and the model was designed to put more limitations on seeds to be classified in this group. The classification accuracy of class one to five was 59, 100, 77, 77 and 89%, respectively. Based on the results we conclude that MSI-based classification of mechanical damage in sugar beet seeds is a potential tool for future seed quality assessment.

Citing Articles

High-Oleic Sunflower Oil as a Potential Substitute for Palm Oil in Sugar Coatings-A Comparative Quality Determination Using Multispectral Imaging and an Electronic Nose.

Ollinger N, Blank-Landeshammer B, Schutz-Kapl L, Rochard A, Pfeifenberger I, Carstensen J Foods. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38890921 PMC: 11172279. DOI: 10.3390/foods13111693.


Advancing horizons in vegetable cultivation: a journey from ageold practices to high-tech greenhouse cultivation-a review.

Ahmed N, Zhang B, Deng L, Bozdar B, Li J, Chachar S Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1357153.

PMID: 38685958 PMC: 11057267. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1357153.


A method for detecting the quality of cotton seeds based on an improved ResNet50 model.

Du X, Si L, Li P, Yun Z PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0273057.

PMID: 36791128 PMC: 9931132. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273057.


Non-Destructive Identification of Naturally Aged Alfalfa Seeds via Multispectral Imaging Analysis.

Wang X, Zhang H, Song R, He X, Mao P, Jia S Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(17).

PMID: 34502695 PMC: 8434479. DOI: 10.3390/s21175804.


Multispectral and X-ray images for characterization of Jatropha curcas L. seed quality.

Bianchini V, Mascarin G, Silva L, Arthur V, Carstensen J, Boelt B Plant Methods. 2021; 17(1):9.

PMID: 33499879 PMC: 7836195. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-021-00709-6.


References
1.
Liu C, Liu W, Lu X, Chen W, Yang J, Zheng L . Nondestructive determination of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.) using multispectral imaging and chemometric methods. Food Chem. 2014; 153:87-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.166. View

2.
Shrestha S, Deleuran L, Olesen M, Gislum R . Use of multispectral imaging in varietal identification of tomato. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(2):4496-512. PMC: 4367422. DOI: 10.3390/s150204496. View

3.
Olesen M, Nikneshan P, Shrestha S, Tadayyon A, Deleuran L, Boelt B . Viability prediction of Ricinus cummunis L. seeds using multispectral imaging. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(2):4592-604. PMC: 4367427. DOI: 10.3390/s150204592. View

4.
Sendin K, Manley M, Williams P . Classification of white maize defects with multispectral imaging. Food Chem. 2017; 243:311-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.133. View

5.
Baek I, Kusumaningrum D, Kandpal L, Lohumi S, Mo C, Kim M . Rapid Measurement of Soybean Seed Viability Using Kernel-Based Multispectral Image Analysis. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(2). PMC: 6359339. DOI: 10.3390/s19020271. View