» Articles » PMID: 31117135

Understanding CancelRx: Results of End-to-End Functional Testing, Proactive Risk Assessment, and Pilot Implementation

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2019 May 23
PMID 31117135
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: CancelRx allows prescribers to send electronic cancellation messages to pharmacies when medications are discontinued. Little is known about its functionality and impact on clinical workflows.

Objectives: To understand CancelRx functionality, its potential impact on workflows and medication safety risks, and to develop mitigating strategies for risks introduced by implementation.

Methods: We conducted direct observations and semi-structured interviews to develop CancelRx use cases and assessed CancelRx in an end-to-end test environment, proactive risk assessment, and pilot implementation from April 16 to July 15, 2018.

Results: E-cancellations were sent upon discontinuation of e-prescriptions written within the electronic health record (EHR), but not other medications (e.g., printed prescriptions) and could be initiated by nonprescribers. In our proactive risk assessment, CancelRx implementation eliminated five of seven failure modes in outpatient prescribing to Johns Hopkins pharmacies, but introduced new risks, including (1) failure to act if an e-cancellation was not sent or was unsuccessful; (2) failure to cancel all prescriptions for a medication; (3) errors in manual matching; and (4) erroneous medication cancellations. We identified potential mitigation strategies for these risks. During pilot implementation, 92.4% (428/463) of e-cancellations had confirmed approval by the receiving pharmacy, while 4.5% (21/463) were denied, and 3.0% (14/463) had no e-cancellation response. Among e-cancellations received by the pilot pharmacy, 1.7% (7/408) required manual matching by pharmacy staff. Based on performance in testing, 73.4% (340/463) of completed e-cancellations would be expected to generate an in-basket message, including 21 (6.2%) denials and 319/340 (93.8%) approvals with a note from the pharmacy.

Conclusion: CancelRx is an important functionality with the potential to decrease adverse events due to medication errors. However, changes in implementation in our EHR and pharmacy software and enhancements in the CancelRx standard are needed to maximize safety and usability. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of e-cancellation on medication safety.

Citing Articles

Understanding the Information Needs of Pharmacy Staff Using CancelRx: A Qualitative Study of the Use of Prescription -cancellation.

Hurley V, Giletta E, Yang Y, Mollenkopf N, Jalalzai R, Schwartz J Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 13:100398.

PMID: 38204887 PMC: 10776446. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100398.


CancelRx case study: implications for clinic and community pharmacy work systems.

Watterson T, Stone J, Kleinschmidt P, Chui M BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1360.

PMID: 38057835 PMC: 10698877. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10396-9.


From MedWreck to MedRec: A Call to Action to Improve Medication Reconciliation.

Kashyap N, Jeffery S, Agresta T Appl Clin Inform. 2023; 15(2):230-233.

PMID: 37748724 PMC: 10972679. DOI: 10.1055/a-2181-1847.


Discontinuation of outpatient medications: implications for electronic messaging to pharmacies using CancelRx.

Pitts S, Yang Y, Thomas B, Chen A J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29(12):2101-2104.

PMID: 36240449 PMC: 9667166. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac181.


CancelRx implementation: Observed changes to medication discontinuation workflows over time.

Watterson T, Hernandez S, Stone J, Gilson A, Ramly E, Chui M Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022; 5:100108.

PMID: 35478523 PMC: 9031435. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100108.


References
1.
Brown C, Mulcaster H, Triffitt K, Sittig D, Ash J, Reygate K . A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 24(2):432-440. PMC: 7651904. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw119. View

2.
Ranji S, Rennke S, Wachter R . Computerised provider order entry combined with clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23(9):773-80. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002165. View

3.
Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Russell Localio A, Kimmel S . Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1197-203. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197. View

4.
Sittig D, Classen D . Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework. JAMA. 2010; 303(5):450-1. PMC: 2965782. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.61. View

5.
Wright A, Aaron S, Sittig D . Testing electronic health records in the "production" environment: an essential step in the journey to a safe and effective health care system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 24(1):188-192. PMC: 5201179. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw039. View