» Articles » PMID: 31108093

Self-sizing Radiofrequency Ablation Balloon for Eradication of Barrett's Esophagus: Results of an International Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing 3 Different Treatment Regimens

Overview
Date 2019 May 21
PMID 31108093
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Recently, the 360 Express radiofrequency ablation balloon catheter (360 Express, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) has replaced the traditional system for circumferential radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim was to compare 3 different ablation regimens for the 360 Express.

Methods: An international multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients with a BE (2-15 cm) with dysplasia or early cancer were randomly assigned to the standard (1 × 10 J/cm-clean-1 × 10 J/cm), simple-double (2 × 10 J/cm-no clean), or simple-single ablation regimen (1 × 10 J/cm-no clean). The primary outcome was the percentage endoscopically visual BE regression at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, adverse events, and patient discomfort.

Results: Between September 2015 and October 2017, 104 patients were enrolled. The simple-double ablation arm was closed prematurely because of a 21% stenosis rate. The trial continued with the standard (n = 37) and simple-single arm (n = 38). Both arms were comparable at baseline. Noninferiority of the simple-single arm could not be demonstrated: BE regression was 73% in the simple-single arm versus 85% in the standard arm; the median difference was 13% (95% confidence interval, 5%-23%). The procedure time was significantly longer in the standard arm (31 vs 17 minutes, P < .001). Both groups were comparable with regard to adverse events and patient discomfort.

Conclusions: This randomized trial shows that circumferential RFA with the 360 Express using the simple-double ablation regimen results in an unacceptable high risk of stenosis. Furthermore, the results suggest that a single ablation at 10 J/cm results in inferior BE regression at 3 months. We therefore advise using the standard ablation regimen (1 × 10 J/cm-clean-1 × 10 J/cm) for treatment of BE using the 360 Express. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR5191.).

Citing Articles

Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for early superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia.

Cheng H, Shiu S, Ko C BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):152.

PMID: 38698314 PMC: 11067246. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03250-7.


Incidence of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Mortality, and Esophagectomy in Barrett's Esophagus Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy.

Smith Z, Thorgerson A, Dawson A, Wani S Dig Dis Sci. 2023; 68(12):4439-4448.

PMID: 37863992 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08107-9.


What Is "Cold" and What Is "Hot" in Mucosal Ablation for Barrett's Oesophagus-Related Dysplasia: A Practical Guide.

Spadaccini M, Alfarone L, Chandrasekar V, Maselli R, Capogreco A, Franchellucci G Life (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37109552 PMC: 10142767. DOI: 10.3390/life13041023.


The role of ablation in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Sullivan R, Mulki R, Peter S Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 14:26317745211049967.

PMID: 34708203 PMC: 8544766. DOI: 10.1177/26317745211049967.


Long-term outcomes after endoscopic treatment for Barrett's neoplasia with radiofrequency ablation ± endoscopic resection: results from the national Dutch database in a 10-year period.

van Munster S, Nieuwenhuis E, Weusten B, Alvarez Herrero L, Bogte A, Alkhalaf A Gut. 2021; 71(2):265-276.

PMID: 33753417 PMC: 8762001. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322615.