» Articles » PMID: 31105473

Personality and Adolescent School-Based Victimization: Do the Big Five Matter?

Overview
Journal J Sch Violence
Date 2019 May 21
PMID 31105473
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Self-control has provided a useful framework for understanding both offending behavior and victimization risk. As a theory of victimization, research has established that low self-control is directly related to victimization risk beyond a range of other factors. This finding raises the issue of whether other personality traits are associated with an increased risk of victimization. Using a sample of ninth-grade adolescents (N = 2,912) from the Rural Substance Abuse and Violence Project (RSVP), we tested whether the Big Five Inventory (BFI) of personality traits predicted adolescent school-based victimization above and beyond low self-control and rival explanations of victimization. The results indicate that, after controlling for risky behaviors, school attachment, and low self-control, neuroticism is positively related to victimization. This finding suggests that examining traits other than low self-control is important to capture fully what makes someone vulnerable to crime. Further, we consider the theoretical and policy implications of the findings.

Citing Articles

Relationship Between Personality Traits and Workplace Bullying Victims in Saudi Arabia.

Alduraibi K, Alfarhan A, Alghaith D, Alharbi A, Almosa M Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58474.

PMID: 38765390 PMC: 11101055. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58474.


The Role of Low Self-Control and Risky Lifestyles in Criminal Victimization: A Study of Adolescents in South Korea.

Kwak H, Kim E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36141772 PMC: 9517007. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811500.


Exploring associations between subjective well-being and personality over a time span of 15-18 months: a cohort study of adolescents in Sweden.

Winzer R, Vaez M, Lindberg L, Sorjonen K BMC Psychol. 2021; 9(1):173.

PMID: 34740376 PMC: 8569843. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00673-9.

References
1.
Esbensen F, Deschenes E, Vogel R, West J, Arboit K, Harris L . Active parental consent in school-based research. An examination of ethical and methodological issues. Eval Rev. 1996; 20(6):737-53. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9602000605. View

2.
Hanish L, Guerra N . The roles of ethnicity and school context in predicting children's victimization by peers. Am J Community Psychol. 2000; 28(2):201-23. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005187201519. View

3.
Ellickson P, Hawes J . An assessment of active versus passive methods for obtaining parental consent. Eval Rev. 1989; 13(1):45-55. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8901300104. View

4.
Nansel T, Overpeck M, Haynie D, Ruan W, Scheidt P . Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157(4):348-53. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.4.348. View

5.
Lauritsen J, Laub J, Sampson R . Conventional and delinquent activities: implications for the prevention of violent victimization among adolescents. Violence Vict. 1992; 7(2):91-108. View