» Articles » PMID: 31105466

Which Way is the Bookstore? A Closer Look at the Judgments of Relative Directions Task

Overview
Date 2019 May 21
PMID 31105466
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of a widely used assay in human spatial cognition, the judgments of relative direction (JRD) task. We conducted three experiments involving virtual navigation interspersed with the JRD task, and included confidence judgments and map drawing as additional metrics. We also present a technique for assessing the similarity of the cognitive representations underlying performance on the JRD and map drawing tasks. Our results support the construct validity of the JRD task and its connection to allocentric representation. Additionally, we found that chance performance on the JRD task depends on the distribution of the angles of participants' responses, rather than being constant and 90 degrees. Accordingly, we present a method for better determining chance performance.

Citing Articles

Using spontaneous eye blink-related brain activity to investigate cognitive load during mobile map-assisted navigation.

Cheng B, Lin E, Wunderlich A, Gramann K, Fabrikant S Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1024583.

PMID: 36866330 PMC: 9971562. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1024583.


Spatial memory distortions for the shapes of walked paths occur in violation of physically experienced geometry.

Du Y, McAvan A, Zheng J, Ekstrom A PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281739.

PMID: 36763702 PMC: 9916584. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281739.


A computational cognitive model of judgments of relative direction.

Newman P, Cox G, McNamara T Cognition. 2021; 209:104559.

PMID: 33388527 PMC: 8205961. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104559.


Current Promises and Limitations of Combined Virtual Reality and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research in Humans: A Commentary on Huffman and Ekstrom (2019).

Steel A, Robertson C, Taube J J Cogn Neurosci. 2020; 33(2):159-166.

PMID: 33054553 PMC: 10284033. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01635.


Landmarks: A solution for spatial navigation and memory experiments in virtual reality.

Starrett M, McAvan A, Huffman D, Stokes J, Kyle C, Smuda D Behav Res Methods. 2020; 53(3):1046-1059.

PMID: 32939682 PMC: 8007414. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01481-6.


References
1.
Hintzman D, Odell C, Arndt D . Orientation in cognitive maps. Cogn Psychol. 1981; 13(2):149-206. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90007-4. View

2.
Waller D, Hodgson E . Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):867-82. PMC: 1501085. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.867. View

3.
Stelzer J, Chen Y, Turner R . Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control. Neuroimage. 2012; 65:69-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.063. View

4.
Stokes J, Kyle C, Ekstrom A . Complementary roles of human hippocampal subfields in differentiation and integration of spatial context. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014; 27(3):546-59. PMC: 4312499. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00736. View

5.
Vlcek K, Laczo J . Neural correlates of spatial navigation changes in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8:89. PMC: 3955968. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00089. View