Reading and the Neurocognitive Bases of Statistical Learning

Overview

Journal Sci Stud Read

Date 2019 May 21

PMID 31105421

Citations 23

Authors

Oliver M Sawi

Jay G Rueckl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The processes underlying word reading are shaped by statistical properties of the writing system. According to some theoretical perspectives (e.g. Harm & Seidenberg, 2004) reading acquisition should be understood as an exercise in statistical learning. (SL) involves the extraction of organizing principles from a set of inputs. Several lines of research provide convergent evidence supporting the connection between SL and reading acquisition (e.g., Arciuli & Simpson, 2012; Frost et al., 2014; Bogaerts et al., 2015). An obstacle to fully appreciating the theoretical and educational implications of these findings is that SL is itself not well understood. In this paper, we review the current literature on SL with a particular focus on organizing this literature by grounding it in theories of learning and memory more generally. This approach can clarify the nature of SL and provide a framework for understanding its role in reading, reading acquisition, and reading disorders.

Citing Articles

Speech Stream Composition Affects Statistical Learning: Behavioral and Neural Evidence.

Soares A, Paiva D, Lema A, Pereira D, Rodrigues A, Oliveira H Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002530 PMC: 11852644. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020198.

Does Nonlinguistic Segmentation Predict Literacy in Second Language Education? Statistical Learning in Ivorian Primary Schools.

Zinszer B, Hannon J, Kouadio A, Akpe H, Tanoh F, Hu A Lang Learn. 2024; 73(4):1039-1086.

PMID: 39099580 PMC: 11293771. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12603.

Memory representations are flexibly adapted to orthographic systems: A comparison of English and Hebrew.

Isbilen E, Laver A, Siegelman N, Aslin R Brain Res. 2024; 1844:149127.

PMID: 39033951 PMC: 11411488. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149127.

Statistical learning and children's emergent literacy in rural Côte d'Ivoire.

Zinszer B, Hannon J, Hu A, Kouadio A, Akpe H, Tanoh F Dev Sci. 2023; 27(5):e13448.

PMID: 37743565 PMC: 10960734. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13448.

Intact procedural memory and impaired auditory statistical learning in adults with dyslexia.

Ozernov-Palchik O, Qi Z, Beach S, Gabrieli J Neuropsychologia. 2023; 188:108638.

PMID: 37516235 PMC: 10805067. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108638.

References

Frost R, Armstrong B, Siegelman N, Christiansen M . Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015; 19(3):117-25. PMC: 4348214. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010. View

Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J . DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(1):204-56. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204. View

Kim R, Seitz A, Feenstra H, Shams L . Testing assumptions of statistical learning: is it long-term and implicit?. Neurosci Lett. 2009; 461(2):145-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.030. View

Gomez R . Do infants retain the statistics of a statistical learning experience? Insights from a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 372(1711). PMC: 5124079. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0054. View

Graves W, Desai R, Humphries C, Seidenberg M, Binder J . Neural systems for reading aloud: a multiparametric approach. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(8):1799-815. PMC: 2901017. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp245. View

Pugh K, Mencl W, Shaywitz B, Shaywitz S, Fulbright R, Constable R . The angular gyrus in developmental dyslexia: task-specific differences in functional connectivity within posterior cortex. Psychol Sci. 2001; 11(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00214. View

Strain E, Herdman C . Imageability effects in word naming: an individual differences analysis. Can J Exp Psychol. 2000; 53(4):347-59. DOI: 10.1037/h0087322. View

Maye J, Werker J, Gerken L . Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition. 2001; 82(3):B101-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3. View

Perruchet P, Pacton S . Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(5):233-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006. View

10.

McClelland J, McNaughton B, OReilly R . Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev. 1995; 102(3):419-457. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419. View

11.

Kirkham N, Slemmer J, Johnson S . Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition. 2002; 83(2):B35-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00004-5. View

12.

Harm M, Seidenberg M . Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. Psychol Rev. 1999; 106(3):491-528. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.491. View

13.

Frost R . Towards a universal model of reading. Behav Brain Sci. 2012; 35(5):263-79. PMC: 3677812. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841. View

14.

Conway C, Pisoni D . Neurocognitive basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to language processing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1145:113-31. PMC: 2605665. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1416.009. View

15.

Rueckl J . Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition. Ment Lex. 2012; 5(3):371-400. PMC: 3427944. DOI: 10.1075/ml.5.3.07rue. View

16.

Jimenez-Fernandez G, Vaquero J, Jimenez L, Defior S . Dyslexic children show deficits in implicit sequence learning, but not in explicit sequence learning or contextual cueing. Ann Dyslexia. 2010; 61(1):85-110. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-010-0048-3. View

17.

Batterink L, Reber P, Neville H, Paller K . Implicit and explicit contributions to statistical learning. J Mem Lang. 2015; 83:62-78. PMC: 4448134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.004. View

18.

Simon K, Werchan D, Goldstein M, Sweeney L, Bootzin R, Nadel L . Sleep confers a benefit for retention of statistical language learning in 6.5month old infants. Brain Lang. 2016; 167:3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.002. View

19.

Apfelbaum K, Hazeltine E, McMurray B . Statistical learning in reading: variability in irrelevant letters helps children learn phonics skills. Dev Psychol. 2012; 49(7):1348-65. DOI: 10.1037/a0029839. View

20.

Kidd E, Arciuli J . Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax. Child Dev. 2015; 87(1):184-93. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12461. View