» Articles » PMID: 31092267

Strategies to Implement and Monitor In-home Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Patient Populations: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 May 17
PMID 31092267
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Transcranial electrical stimulation is a promising technique to facilitate behavioural improvements in neurological and psychiatric populations. Recently there has been interest in remote delivery of stimulation within a participant's home.

Objective: The purpose of this review is to identify strategies employed to implement and monitor in-home stimulation and identify whether these approaches are associated with protocol adherence, adverse events and patient perspectives.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase Classic + Embase, Emcare and PsycINFO databases and clinical trial registries were searched to identify studies which reported primary data for any type of transcranial electrical stimulation applied as a home-based treatment.

Results: Nineteen published studies from unique trials and ten on-going trials were included. For published data, internal validity was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool with most studies exhibiting a high level of bias possibly reflecting the preliminary nature of current work. Several different strategies were employed to prepare the participant, deliver and monitor the in-home transcranial electrical stimulation. The use of real time videoconferencing to monitor in-home transcranial electrical stimulation appeared to be associated with higher levels of compliance with the stimulation protocol and greater participant satisfaction. There were no severe adverse events associated with in-home stimulation.

Conclusions: Delivery of transcranial electrical stimulation within a person's home offers many potential benefits and appears acceptable and safe provided appropriate preparation and monitoring is provided. Future in-home transcranial electrical stimulation studies should use real-time videoconferencing as one of the approaches to facilitate delivery of this potentially beneficial treatment.

Citing Articles

Concurrent self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation and attention bias modification training in binge eating disorder: feasibility randomised sham-controlled trial.

Flynn M, Campbell I, Schmidt U BJPsych Open. 2024; 10(4):e118.

PMID: 38840537 PMC: 11363089. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.54.


Transcranial direct current stimulation as treatment for major depression in a home treatment setting (HomeDC trial): study protocol and methodology of a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

Kumpf U, Ezim H, Stadler M, Burkhardt G, Palm U, Dechantsreiter E Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):197.

PMID: 38102647 PMC: 10722795. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01423-x.


Home-administered transcranial direct current stimulation with asynchronous remote supervision in the treatment of depression: feasibility, tolerability, and clinical effectiveness.

Koutsomitros T, Schwarz S, van der Zee K, Schuhmann T, Sack A Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1206805.

PMID: 38025428 PMC: 10652875. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1206805.


An Educational Program for Remote Training and Supervision of Home-Based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness.

Cappon D, den Boer T, Yu W, LaGanke N, Fox R, Brozgol M Neuromodulation. 2023; 27(4):636-644.

PMID: 37552152 PMC: 10850429. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.477.


Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.

Arntz A, Weber F, Handgraaf M, Lalla K, Korniloff K, Murtonen K JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023; 10:e43615.

PMID: 37253381 PMC: 10415951. DOI: 10.2196/43615.


References
1.
Liebetanz D, Nitsche M, Tergau F, Paulus W . Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 10):2238-47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf238. View

2.
Shiozawa P, Fregni F, Bensenor I, Lotufo P, Berlim M, Daskalakis J . Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014; 17(9):1443-52. DOI: 10.1017/S1461145714000418. View

3.
Hagenacker T, Bude V, Naegel S, Holle D, Katsarava Z, Diener H . Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia. J Headache Pain. 2014; 15:78. PMC: 4256974. DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-78. View

4.
Lopez-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Rio-Rodriguez D, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M . Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):372-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004. View

5.
OShea J, Revol P, Cousijn H, Near J, Petitet P, Jacquin-Courtois S . Induced sensorimotor cortex plasticity remediates chronic treatment-resistant visual neglect. Elife. 2017; 6. PMC: 5595432. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.26602. View