The Burden of Informal Caregiving in Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: Results from National Representative Surveys

Overview

Journal Eur J Health Econ

Specialty Health Services

Date 2019 May 16

PMID 31089990

Citations 14

Authors

Petra Baji

Dominik Golicki

Valentina Prevolnik-Rupel

Werner B F Brouwer

Zsombor Zrubka

Laszlo Gulacsi

Marta Pentek

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to investigate the burden of informal care in Hungary (HU), Poland (PL) and Slovenia (SI).

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was performed involving representative samples of 1000 respondents per country. Caregiving situations were explored; health status of informal caregivers/care recipients and care-related quality of life were assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and CarerQol-7D.

Results: The proportion of caregivers was (HU/PL/SI) 14.9, 15.0 and 9.6%, respectively. Their mean age was 56.1, 45.6 and 48.0, and the average time spent on informal care was 27.6, 35.5 and 28.8 h/week. Chronic care was dominant (> 1 year: 78.5%, 72.0%, 74.0%) and care recipients were mainly (own/in-law) parents. Average EQ-5D-5L scores of care recipients were 0.53, 0.49 and 0.52. For Poland and Slovenia, EQ-5D-5L scores of informal care providers were significantly lower than of other respondents. Average CarerQol-7D scores were (HU/PL/SI) 76.0, 69.6 and 70.9, and CarerQol-VAS was 6.8, 6.4 and 6.6, respectively. Overall, 89, 87, and 84% of caregivers felt some or a lot fulfilment related to caring. Problems with combining tasks with daily activities were most important in Hungary and Slovenia. Women had a higher probability of being a caregiver in Hungary. CarerQol-7D scores were significantly associated with caregivers' EQ-5D-5L scores. In Hungary and Poland, living in a larger household was positively, while caring for patients with mental health problems was negatively associated with CarerQol-7D scores.

Conclusions: These first results from the Central and Eastern European region using preference-based measures for the evaluation of informal care can serve as a valuable input for health economic analyses.

Citing Articles

Attributes Desired in a General Practitioner by Adults: Implications for Humanization in Medicine and Enhancement of the Patient Experience.

Szczepek A, Wrzosek M, Makowska M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39766016 PMC: 11727714. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242589.

Perceptions of Stress and Engagement in High-Intensity Caregiving: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lithuania.

Jaruseviciene L, Zaborskis A, Blazeviciene A, Valius L, Kontrimiene A Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241290081.

PMID: 39497624 PMC: 11536479. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241290081.

Patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with cleft palate.

Xia W, Du M, Wu M, Chen Z, Yang R, Shi B Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1469455.

PMID: 39281080 PMC: 11393830. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469455.

Time value of informal care of people with alzheimer's disease in Spain: a population-based analysis.

C V, J O Eur J Health Econ. 2024; .

PMID: 39117786 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01713-y.

Childhood Adversities and Caregiving for Older Parents: Building Capacity for a Caring Society.

Hu B, Bai X, Wang P J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024; 79(7).

PMID: 38742591 PMC: 11184527. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbae083.

References

Brouwer W, van Exel N, van den Berg B, van den Bos G, Koopmanschap M . Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring. Health Policy. 2005; 74(1):85-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.12.008. View

Brouwer W, van Exel N, van Gorp B, Redekop W . The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15(6):1005-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-5994-6. View

Lopez-Bastida J, Perestelo-Perez L, Monton-Alvarez F, Serrano-Aguilar P . Social economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with degenerative cerebellar ataxia in Spain. Mov Disord. 2007; 23(2):212-7. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21798. View

van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W . The invisible hands made visible: recognizing the value of informal care in healthcare decision-making. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010; 8(6):557-61. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.6.557. View

Bobinac A, van Exel N, Rutten F, Brouwer W . Health effects in significant others: separating family and care-giving effects. Med Decis Making. 2010; 31(2):292-8. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10374212. View

Hoefman R, van Exel N, Looren de Jong S, Redekop W, Brouwer W . A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: measuring the impact of informal care giving. Qual Life Res. 2011; 20(6):875-87. PMC: 3228404. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9829-8. View

Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D . Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011; 20(10):1727-36. PMC: 3220807. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. View

Hoefman R, van Exel J, Rose J, van de Wetering E, Brouwer W . A discrete choice experiment to obtain a tariff for valuing informal care situations measured with the CarerQol instrument. Med Decis Making. 2013; 34(1):84-96. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13492013. View

Kanters T, van der Ploeg A, Brouwer W, Hakkaart L . The impact of informal care for patients with Pompe disease: an application of the CarerQol instrument. Mol Genet Metab. 2013; 110(3):281-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.07.020. View

10.

Hoefman R, van Exel J, Brouwer W . Measuring the impact of caregiving on informal carers: a construct validation study of the CarerQol instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11:173. PMC: 4015499. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-173. View

11.

Hoefman R, van Exel J, Brouwer W . How to include informal care in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013; 31(12):1105-19. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0104-z. View

12.

Tamas G, Gulacsi L, Bereczki D, Baji P, Takats A, Brodszky V . Quality of life and costs in Parkinson's disease: a cross sectional study in Hungary. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e107704. PMC: 4167855. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107704. View

13.

Austin P, Steyerberg E . The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(6):627-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014. View

14.

Iskrov G, Astigarraga I, Stefanov R, Lopez-Bastida J, Linertova R, Oliva-Moreno J . Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with histiocytosis in Europe. Eur J Health Econ. 2016; 17 Suppl 1:67-78. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0790-5. View

15.

Pentek M, Gulacsi L, Brodszky V, Baji P, Boncz I, Pogany G . Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life of mucopolysaccharidosis patients and their caregivers in Europe. Eur J Health Econ. 2016; 17 Suppl 1:89-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0787-0. View

16.

Raciborski F, Klak A, Kwiatkowska B . Indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatologia. 2016; 53(5):268-75. PMC: 4847321. DOI: 10.5114/reum.2015.55830. View

17.

Holko P, Kawalec P, Mossakowska M, Pilc A . Health-Related Quality of Life Impairment and Indirect Cost of Crohn's Disease: A Self-Report Study in Poland. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0168586. PMC: 5161376. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168586. View

18.

Golicki D, Niewada M . EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms. Arch Med Sci. 2017; 13(1):191-200. PMC: 5206353. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.52126. View

19.

Kobelt G, Thompson A, Berg J, Gannedahl M, Eriksson J . New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Mult Scler. 2017; 23(8):1123-1136. PMC: 5476197. DOI: 10.1177/1352458517694432. View

20.

Devlin N, Shah K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B . Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2017; 27(1):7-22. PMC: 6680214. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3564. View