[Differentiated Surgical Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence-between Intention and Reality?]

Overview

Journal Urologe A

Specialty Urology

Date 2019 May 16

PMID 31089755

Citations 1

Authors

S Muhlstadt

T Husch

R M Bauer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The differentiated surgical treatment of male urinary incontinence is a very interesting and sometimes also emotional topic, in which evidence is increasingly maturing. Nowadays, the most common surgical procedures are fixed sling and adjustable incontinence systems as well as the artificial urinary sphincter. The evidence for the procedures varies and there is currently a lack of prospective, comparative studies. The challenging question is: Which operation is the best for which patient? The following article is intended to give an overview of the surgical options and a constructive attempt to differentiate the indication.

Citing Articles

OAB After ATOMS: An Underestimated Problem or a Rare Side Effect?.

Schonburg S, Bauer W, Mohammed N, Brossner C, Fornara P Front Surg. 2020; 6:72.

PMID: 31921886 PMC: 6928117. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00072.

References

Hubner W, Schlarp O . Treatment of incontinence after prostatectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy. BJU Int. 2005; 96(4):587-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05689.x. View

Rocha F, Gomes C, Mitre A, Arap S, Srougi M . A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Urology. 2008; 71(1):85-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.009. View

Bauer R, Bastian P, Gozzi C, Stief C . Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2008; 55(2):322-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.029. View

Cornel E, Elzevier H, Putter H . Can advance transobturator sling suspension cure male urinary postoperative stress incontinence?. J Urol. 2010; 183(4):1459-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.013. View

Hubner W, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber E . Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2010; 107(5):777-782. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09619.x. View

Bauer R, Soljanik I, Fullhase C, Buchner A, May F, Stief C . Results of the AdVance transobturator male sling after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Urology. 2010; 77(2):474-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.541. View

Seweryn J, Bauer W, Ponholzer A, Schramek P . Initial experience and results with a new adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012; 187(3):956-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.138. View

Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu J, Gozzi C, Bauer R . Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(1):140-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.038. View

Hoda M, Primus G, Fischereder K, von Heyden B, Mohammed N, Schmid N . Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. BJU Int. 2012; 111(2):296-303. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11482.x. View

10.

Chung E, Ranaweera M, Cartmill R . Newer and novel artificial urinary sphincters (AUS): the development of alternatives to the current AUS device. BJU Int. 2012; 110 Suppl 4:5-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11614.x. View

11.

Van der Aa F, Drake M, Kasyan G, Petrolekas A, Cornu J . The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012; 63(4):681-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034. View

12.

Collado Serra A, Resel Folkersma L, Dominguez-Escrig J, Gomez-Ferrer A, Rubio-Briones J, Solsona Narbon E . AdVance/AdVance XP transobturator male slings: preoperative degree of incontinence as predictor of surgical outcome. Urology. 2013; 81(5):1034-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.007. View

13.

Bauer R, Gozzi C, Roosen A, Khoder W, Trottmann M, Waidelich R . Impact of the 'repositioning test' on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation. Urol Int. 2013; 90(3):334-8. DOI: 10.1159/000347123. View

14.

Kowalik C, DeLong J, Mourtzinos A . The advance transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: subjective and objective outcomes with 3 years follow up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013; 34(3):251-4. DOI: 10.1002/nau.22539. View

15.

Leon P, Chartier-Kastler E, Roupret M, Ambrogi V, Mozer P, Phe V . Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2014; 115(6):951-7. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12848. View

16.

Romano S, Huebner W, Rocha F, Vaz F, Muller V, Nakamura F . A transobturator adjustable system for male incontinence: 30-month follow-up of a multicenter study. Int Braz J Urol. 2015; 40(6):781-9. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.06.09. View

17.

Bauer R, Rutkowski M, Kretschmer A, Casuscelli J, Stief C, Huebner W . Efficacy and complications of the adjustable sling system ArgusT for male incontinence: results of a prospective 2-center study. Urology. 2015; 85(2):316-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.019. View

18.

Linder B, Rivera M, Ziegelmann M, Elliott D . Long-term Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: An Analysis of 1082 Cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology. 2015; 86(3):602-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.029. View

19.

Kretschmer A, Husch T, Thomsen F, Kronlachner D, Pottek T, Obaje A . Efficacy and safety of the ZSI375 artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence: lessons learned. World J Urol. 2016; 34(10):1457-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1787-5. View

20.

Muhlstadt S, Friedl A, Mohammed N, Schumann A, Weigand K, Kawan F . Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation. World J Urol. 2016; 35(1):145-151. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1839-x. View