» Articles » PMID: 31088551

Utilizing the Focused Conversation Method in Qualitative Public Health Research: a Team-based Approach

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 May 16
PMID 31088551
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Qualitative research studies are becoming increasingly necessary to understand the complex challenges in the healthcare setting. Successfully integrating interdisciplinary teams of investigators can be challenging, as investigators inherently view data through their disciplinary lens. Thus, new methods, such as focused conservation, are needed to facilitate qualitative data analysis by interdisciplinary teams. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a clear description of how we implemented the focused conversation method to facilitate an organized data-driven discussion that responded to our study objectives and ensured participation of our interdisciplinary team. The focused conversation method has not, to our knowledge, been utilized for this purpose to date.

Methods: To better understand the experience of healthcare personnel (HCP) during preparations for the 2014-2015 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak, we interviewed HCP who participated in decision making about EVD preparations and training of workers in the use of enhanced personal protective equipment ensembles in the metropolitan Chicagoland area of Illinois to attain a priori research objectives. We identified a systematic method - the focused conversation method - that enabled our interdisciplinary team to interactively contribute to the framing, analysis and interpretation of the data that would enable us to focus on our research objectives.

Results: The focused conversation developed to support our a priori research objective about the training of HCP in preparations included objective, reflective, interpretive and decisional questions. These questions grounded the conversation in the data, while leveraging discipline-specific lenses and professional experience in the analysis and interpretation. Insights from the conversation were reviewed later against interview transcripts to ensure validity. The conversation identified areas for future research directions and deficiencies in the interview instrument.

Conclusions: The focused conversation is an efficient, organized method for analysis of qualitative data by an interdisciplinary team.

Citing Articles

Witnessing Self-Affirming Moments in Persons with Dementia While Interacting with Therapy Dogs: A Case Report.

Brooks C, Dell C, Chalmers D, Carey B Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765524 PMC: 11672456. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243620.


Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.

Alderighi C, Rasoini R, Formoso G, Celani M, Rosenbaum S F1000Res. 2022; 11:1167.

PMID: 36329796 PMC: 9617069. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.123728.1.


Integrating teacher data literacy with TPACK: A self-report study based on a novel framework for teachers' professional development.

Cui Y, Zhang H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:966575.

PMID: 36248455 PMC: 9559732. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966575.


Implications of disparities in social and built environment antecedents to adult nature engagement.

Tomasso L, Laurent J, Chen J, Spengler J PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0274948.

PMID: 36149849 PMC: 9506603. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274948.


Experience and Perceptions of Changes in the Living Environment by Older People Losing Their Autonomy: A Qualitative Study in the Caribbean.

Chammem R, Domi S, Della Vecchia C, Gilbert T, Schott A Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021; 14:743-756.

PMID: 33654442 PMC: 7910078. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S287382.


References
1.
Fitzpatrick R, Boulton M . Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Qual Health Care. 1994; 3(2):107-13. PMC: 1055206. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.107. View

2.
Caress A, Luker K, Woodcock A, Beaver K . An exploratory study of priority information needs in adult asthma patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 47(4):319-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00005-8. View

3.
Stokols D, Misra S, Moser R, Hall K, Taylor B . The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S96-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003. View

4.
Forman J, Creswell J, Damschroder L, Kowalski C, Krein S . Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36(10):764-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.010. View

5.
Bennett L, Gadlin H . Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012; 60(5):768-75. PMC: 3652225. DOI: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d. View