Fast Kilovoltage-switching Dual-energy CT Offering Lower X-ray Dose Than Single-energy CT for the Chest: a Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison Study of the Two Methods of Acquisition

Overview

Journal Diagn Interv Radiol

Publisher Galenos Publishing House

Date 2019 May 16

PMID 31085505

Citations 3

Authors

Osman Melih Topcuoglu

Basar Sarikaya

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), computed tomography (CT) dose indices and image quality parameters of the chest CTs obtained with fast kilovoltage-switching (FKS) dual-energy (DE) CT versus those with single-energy (SE) CT.

Methods: Patients who had chest SECT within the last 6 months were prospectively scanned with chest FKS-DECT. Quantitative comparison was made by calculating the mean SSDE, CTDIvol, contrast, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for both acquisitions. Two radiologists evaluated the chest SECT and DECT images qualitatively blinded to the technique used. The paired Student's t test was utilized for comparing the quantitative and qualitative data. Inter- and intraobserver agreement were also assessed.

Results: A total of 42 patients were included. The mean SSDE, CTDIvol, contrast, noise, CNR, and SNR for SECT versus DECT were 12.7±2.2 mGy vs. 9.3±1.2 mGy (P = 0.001), 10.9±2.4 mGy vs. 8±1.2 mGy (P < 0.001), 211.9±44.7 vs. 216.3±59 (P = 0.350), 12.9±2.4 vs. 13.9±3.7 (P = 0.086), 13.5±5.2 vs. 13.3±8.4 (P = 0.548) and 12±3.5 vs. 11.5±3.4 (P = 0.774), respectively. Interobserver reproducibility was high for contrast, noise, CNR, and SNR (ICC = 0.89, 0.85, 0.93, and 0.82, respectively; all P < 0.05). Intraobserver reproducibility was high for contrast, noise, CNR, and SNR (ICC = 0.80, 0.77, 0.85, and 0.88, respectively; all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The mean SSDE of the chest CTs obtained with FKS-DECT were 26.8% lower than those with SECT with significant difference for the objective assessment and there was no significant difference for the subjective assessment of the image qualities, in this series.

Citing Articles

Dual-energy CT in musculoskeletal imaging: technical considerations and clinical applications.

Albano D, Di Luca F, DAngelo T, Booz C, Midiri F, Gitto S Radiol Med. 2024; 129(7):1038-1047.

PMID: 38743319 PMC: 11252181. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01827-6.

Photon-counting computed tomography in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: an initial experience.

Marton N, Gyebnar J, Fritsch K, Majnik J, Nagy G, Simon J Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 29(2):291-299.

PMID: 36987949 PMC: 10679703. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.221959.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Breast Cancer Follow-Ups: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Images and Iodine-Map.

Li J, Xie F, Chen C, Chen K, Tsai C Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35453994 PMC: 9028705. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040946.

References

Schoepf U, Colletti P . New dimensions in imaging: the awakening of dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(5 Suppl):S1-2. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9119. View

Geyer L, Scherr M, Korner M, Wirth S, Deak P, Reiser M . Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism using a dual energy CT system with rapid kVp switching: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(12):3711-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.043. View

Silva A, Morse B, Hara A, Paden R, Hongo N, Pavlicek W . Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. Radiographics. 2011; 31(4):1031-46. DOI: 10.1148/rg.314105159. View

Rizzo S, Kalra M, Schmidt B, Dalal T, Suess C, Flohr T . Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186(3):673-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1513. View

Pessis E, Campagna R, Sverzut J, Bach F, Rodallec M, Guerini H . Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics. 2013; 33(2):573-83. DOI: 10.1148/rg.332125124. View

Schenzle J, Sommer W, Neumaier K, Michalski G, Lechel U, Nikolaou K . Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45(6):347-53. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181df901d. View

Buty M, Xu Z, Wu A, Gao M, Nelson C, Papadakis G . Quantitative Image Quality Comparison of Reduced- and Standard-Dose Dual-Energy Multiphase Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis CT. Tomography. 2017; 3(2):114-122. PMC: 5573232. DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2017.00002. View

Kamiya K, Kunimatsu A, Mori H, Sato J, Akahane M, Yamakawa T . Preliminary report on virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kVp switching dual energy head CT: comparable image quality to that of 120-kVp CT without increasing the radiation dose. Jpn J Radiol. 2013; 31(4):293-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-013-0185-9. View

Forghani R, De Man B, Gupta R . Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Approaches to Scanning, Usage, and Implementation: Part 2. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017; 27(3):385-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2017.03.003. View

10.

Apfaltrer P, Sudarski S, Schneider D, Nance Jr J, Haubenreisser H, Fink C . Value of monoenergetic low-kV dual energy CT datasets for improved image quality of CT pulmonary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 83(2):322-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.005. View

11.

Zhang D, Li X, Liu B . Objective characterization of GE discovery CT750 HD scanner: gemstone spectral imaging mode. Med Phys. 2011; 38(3):1178-88. DOI: 10.1118/1.3551999. View

12.

Agrawal M, Pinho D, Kulkarni N, Hahn P, Guimaraes A, Sahani D . Oncologic applications of dual-energy CT in the abdomen. Radiographics. 2014; 34(3):589-612. DOI: 10.1148/rg.343135041. View

13.

Kaza R, Platt J, Cohan R, Caoili E, Al-Hawary M, Wasnik A . Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics. 2012; 32(2):353-69. DOI: 10.1148/rg.322115065. View

14.

Albrecht M, Scholtz J, Husers K, Beeres M, Bucher A, Kaup M . Advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT angiography of the abdomen: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings to improve image contrast. Eur Radiol. 2015; 26(6):1863-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3970-2. View

15.

Soderberg M, Gunnarsson M . Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol. 2010; 51(6):625-34. DOI: 10.3109/02841851003698206. View

16.

Mulkens T, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E . Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology. 2005; 237(1):213-23. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2363041220. View

17.

Lam S, Gupta R, Kelly H, Curtin H, Forghani R . Multiparametric Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using a Single-Source Dual-Energy CT with Fast kVp Switching: State of the Art. Cancers (Basel). 2015; 7(4):2201-16. PMC: 4695886. DOI: 10.3390/cancers7040886. View

18.

Papadakis A, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J . Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. Med Phys. 2008; 35(10):4567-76. DOI: 10.1118/1.2977535. View

19.

Doerner J, Hauger M, Hickethier T, Byrtus J, Wybranski C, Grosse Hokamp N . Image quality evaluation of dual-layer spectral detector CT of the chest and comparison with conventional CT imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017; 93:52-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.016. View

20.

Kanal K, Butler P, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs L, Morin R . U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. Radiology. 2017; 284(1):120-133. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161911. View