» Articles » PMID: 31081580

Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Bowel Dysfunction Following Low Anterior Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Colorectal Dis
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 May 14
PMID 31081580
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) can affect up to 70% of all patients with rectal cancer. In the last two decades, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has emerged as an effective treatment for faecal incontinence. There is some encouraging literature on the use of SNS in patients with LARS. The purpose of this review is to provide an up to date review on the utility of SNS on LARS.

Method: A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed databases (January 1981-March 2019). Studies identified were appraised with standard selection criteria. Data points were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. All studies used the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), whereas the low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS score) was used in three studies. Overall median improvement in the scoring system was 67.0% (range 35.5%-88.2%) after SNS implantation. There was a significant reduction in CCIS after SNS implantation (mean difference 11.23, 95% confidence interval 9.38-13.07, Z = 11.90, P < 0.00001). The LARS score was also significantly reduced after using SNS in patients with LARS (mean difference 17.87, 95% confidence interval 10.15-25.59, Z = 4.54, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion: Use of SNS may provide symptomatic benefits for patients with LARS refractory to medical therapy. However, the current level of evidence remains limited. A large multicentre study of SNS for LARS using the validated LARS score is warranted. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of SNS for patients with LARS needs further exploration.

Citing Articles

Optimal interventions for low anterior resection syndrome: Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu M, Liu Y, Li N, Xu J, Zhang H, Li F Tech Coloproctol. 2025; 29(1):64.

PMID: 39945891 PMC: 11825619. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03099-8.


Systematic review of the management options available for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

Sharp G, Findlay N, Clark D, Hong J Tech Coloproctol. 2025; 29(1):58.

PMID: 39903381 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03090-3.


Pathway Of Low Anterior Resection syndrome (LARS) relief after Surgery (POLARiS): protocol for an international, open-label, multi-arm, phase 3 randomised superiority trial within a cohort, with economic evaluation, process evaluation and....

Croft J, Farrow E, Coxon-Meggy A, Gordon K, Corrigan N, Mather H BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e092612.

PMID: 39900423 PMC: 11800293. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092612.


Guideline for the assessment and management of gastrointestinal symptoms following colorectal surgery-A UEG/ESCP/EAES/ESPCG/ESPEN/ESNM/ESSO collaboration. Part I-Sequelae to oncological diseases.

Gielen A United European Gastroenterol J. 2024; 12(10):1489-1506.

PMID: 39576262 PMC: 11652338. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12658.


Biofeedback combined with percutaneous electrical pudendal nerve stimulation for the treatment of low anterior rectal resection syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Cao G, Zhang X, Wang F, Man D, Wu L, Pan X Trials. 2024; 25(1):440.

PMID: 38956630 PMC: 11221096. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08300-9.