» Articles » PMID: 31075859

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Data Privacy: Key Concerns and Recommendations Based on Consumer Perspectives

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2019 May 12
PMID 31075859
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) companies are engaging health consumers in unprecedented ways and leveraging the genetic information they collect to further engage health companies. This has produced controversy about DTC-GT consumer expectations, standards, and perceptions of privacy. In this commentary, we highlight recent events involving DTC-GT companies and controversy about privacy that followed those events and discuss recent studies that have explored DTC-GT consumer concerns about privacy. We discuss DTC-GT company standards of upholding consumer privacy and the general accessibility of DTC-GT company terms of use agreements and privacy policies that are written at reading levels above that of many consumers. We conclude that broader discussions and more research are needed to identify DTC-GT consumer concerns about and expectations of privacy. We anticipate that our recommendations will advance discussions on consumer privacy expectations and protections in an era of increasing engagement in DTC-GT.

Citing Articles

Navigating sexual orientation and gender identity data privacy concerns in United States genetics practices.

Zayhowski K, Roth S, Westerfield M, Martin M, Blumen K, Bland H J Genet Couns. 2025; 34(2):e70008.

PMID: 40055970 PMC: 11889477. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.70008.


Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?.

Briscoe F, Maxwell J, Bourgoin A Front Genet. 2024; 15:1496900.

PMID: 39698465 PMC: 11652517. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900.


Perceptions of Multicancer Detection Tests Among Primary Care Physicians and Laypersons: A Qualitative Study.

Samimi G, Temkin S, Weil C, Han P, LeeVan E, Rubinstein W Cancer Med. 2024; 13(21):e70281.

PMID: 39475101 PMC: 11523003. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70281.


Ethical Aspects of Human Genome Research in Sports-A Narrative Review.

Bojarczuk A Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39336807 PMC: 11430849. DOI: 10.3390/genes15091216.


Patient perspectives on pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for antidepressant prescribing in primary care: a qualitative description study.

Cernat A, Samaan Z, Abelson J, Ramdyal A, Shaikh H, Vanstone M J Community Genet. 2024; 15(3):293-309.

PMID: 38587601 PMC: 11217204. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00705-y.


References
1.
Murphy Bollinger J, Green R, Kaufman D . Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013; 17(5):424-8. PMC: 3634146. DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0453. View

2.
Critchley C, Nicol D, Otlowski M, Chalmers D . Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intentions across commercial and conventional providers. Public Underst Sci. 2014; 24(6):731-50. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513519937. View

3.
Laestadius L, Rich J, Auer P . All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms. Genet Med. 2016; 19(5):513-520. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.136. View

4.
Hamilton J, Abdiwahab E, Edwards H, Fang M, Jdayani A, Breslau E . Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 32(3):315-324. PMC: 5331015. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3943-4. View

5.
Roberts J, Gornick M, Carere D, Uhlmann W, Ruffin M, Green R . Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results. Public Health Genomics. 2017; 20(1):36-45. DOI: 10.1159/000455006. View