» Articles » PMID: 31073816

Assessment of Critical Feeding Tube Malpositions on Radiographs Using Deep Learning

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 May 11
PMID 31073816
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Assess the efficacy of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) in detection of critical enteric feeding tube malpositions on radiographs. 5475 de-identified HIPAA compliant frontal view chest and abdominal radiographs were obtained, consisting of 174 x-rays of bronchial insertions and 5301 non-critical radiographs, including normal course, normal chest, and normal abdominal x-rays. The ground-truth classification for enteric feeding tube placement was performed by two board-certified radiologists. Untrained and pretrained deep convolutional neural network models for Inception V3, ResNet50, and DenseNet 121 were each employed. The radiographs were fed into each deep convolutional neural network, which included untrained and pretrained models. The Tensorflow framework was used for Inception V3, ResNet50, and DenseNet. Images were split into training (4745), validation (630), and test (100). Both real-time and preprocessing image augmentation strategies were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) on the test data were used to assess the models. Statistical differences among the AUCs were obtained. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The pretrained Inception V3, which had an AUC of 0.87 (95 CI; 0.80-0.94), performed statistically significantly better (p < .001) than the untrained Inception V3, with an AUC of 0.60 (95 CI; 0.52-0.68). The pretrained Inception V3 also had the highest AUC overall, as compared with ResNet50 and DenseNet121, with AUC values ranging from 0.82 to 0.85. Each pretrained network outperformed its untrained counterpart. (p < 0.05). Deep learning demonstrates promise in differentiating critical vs. non-critical placement with an AUC of 0.87. Pretrained networks outperformed untrained ones in all cases. DCNNs may allow for more rapid identification and communication of critical feeding tube malpositions.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Links Between Artificial Intelligence and Precision Nutrition.

Ferreira D, Ferreira L, Amorim K, Delfino D, Ferreira A, Souza L Curr Nutr Rep. 2025; 14(1):47.

PMID: 40087237 DOI: 10.1007/s13668-025-00635-2.


Deep Convolutional Backbone Comparison for Automated PET Image Quality Assessment.

Hopson J, Flaus A, McGinnity C, Neji R, Reader A, Hammers A IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2024; 8(8):893-901.

PMID: 39404656 PMC: 7616552. DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3436697.


Detection and position evaluation of chest percutaneous drainage catheter on chest radiographs using deep learning.

Kim D, Nam I, Kim D, Kim J, Hwang I, Lee J PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0305859.

PMID: 39133733 PMC: 11318879. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305859.


Deep Learning-Based Localization and Detection of Malpositioned Nasogastric Tubes on Portable Supine Chest X-Rays in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: A Multi-center Retrospective Study.

Wang C, Hwang T, Huang Y, Tay J, Wu C, Wu M J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 38(1):335-345.

PMID: 38980623 PMC: 11811315. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01181-z.


Artificial intelligence in the detection of non-biological materials.

Eibschutz L, Lu M, Abbassi M, Gholamrezanezhad A Emerg Radiol. 2024; 31(3):391-403.

PMID: 38530436 PMC: 11130001. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-024-02222-4.


References
1.
Sorokin R, Gottlieb J . Enhancing patient safety during feeding-tube insertion: a review of more than 2,000 insertions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006; 30(5):440-5. DOI: 10.1177/0148607106030005440. View

2.
Sheng C, Li L, Pei W . Automatic detection of supporting device positioning in intensive care unit radiography. Int J Med Robot. 2009; 5(3):332-40. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.265. View

3.
Nayak S, Sherchan M, Dutta Poudel S, Chamling Rai J, Shrestha R, Shretha B . Assessing placement of nasoduodenal tube and its usefulness in maintaining nutrition in critically ill patients. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009; 10(4):249-53. View

4.
Odocha O, Lowery Jr R, Mezghebe H, Siram S, Warner O . Tracheopleuropulmonary injuries following enteral tube insertion. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989; 81(3):275-81. PMC: 2571629. View

5.
Tuna M, Latifi R, El-Menyar A, Al Thani H . Gastrointestinal tract access for enteral nutrition in critically ill and trauma patients: indications, techniques, and complications. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 39(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0274-6. View