» Articles » PMID: 31071964

Using Thermography to Confirm Genotypic Variation for Drought Response in Maize

Abstract

The feasibility of thermography as a technique for plant screening aiming at drought-tolerance has been proven by its relationship with gas exchange, biomass, and yield. In this study, unlike most of the previous, thermography was applied for phenotyping contrasting maize genotypes whose classification for drought tolerance had already been established in the field. Our objective was to determine whether thermography-based classification would discriminate the maize genotypes in a similar way as the field selection in which just grain yield was taken into account as a criterion. We evaluated gas exchange, daily water consumption, leaf relative water content, aboveground biomass, and grain yield. Indeed, the screening of maize genotypes based on canopy temperature showed similar results to traditional methods. Nevertheless, canopy temperature only partially reflected gas exchange rates and daily water consumption in plants under drought. Part of the explanation may lie in the changes that drought had caused in plant leaves and canopy structure, altering absorption and dissipation of energy, photosynthesis, transpiration, and partitioning rates. Accordingly, although there was a negative relationship between grain yield and plant canopy temperature, it does not necessarily mean that plants whose canopies were maintained cooler under drought achieved the highest yield.

Citing Articles

A simple new method to determine leaf specific heat capacity.

Zhang J, Kaiser E, Zhang H, Marcelis L, Vialet-Chabrand S Plant Methods. 2025; 21(1):6.

PMID: 39856783 PMC: 11759430. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-025-01326-3.


Sensing Technologies for Outdoor/Indoor Farming.

Wang L, Xiao M, Guo X, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Lee C Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39727894 PMC: 11674220. DOI: 10.3390/bios14120629.


Shifts in plant architecture drive species-specific responses to drought in a Sorghum recombinant inbred line population.

Lehrer M, Govindarajulu R, Smith F, Hawkins J Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2024; 27(1):125-133.

PMID: 39476337 PMC: 11656278. DOI: 10.1111/plb.13733.


AI-assisted image analysis and physiological validation for progressive drought detection in a diverse panel of L.

Reno V, Cardellicchio A, Romanjenko B, Guadagno C Front Plant Sci. 2024; 14:1305292.

PMID: 38449576 PMC: 10915054. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1305292.


Water Stress Alters Physiological, Spectral, and Agronomic Indexes of Wheat Genotypes.

Tavares C, Ribeiro Junior W, Ramos M, Pereira L, Muller O, Casari R Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(20).

PMID: 37896034 PMC: 10609785. DOI: 10.3390/plants12203571.


References
1.
Woo N, Badger M, Pogson B . A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods. 2008; 4:27. PMC: 2628343. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-4-27. View

2.
Mukaka M . Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2013; 24(3):69-71. PMC: 3576830. View

3.
Munns R, James R, Sirault X, Furbank R, Jones H . New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. J Exp Bot. 2010; 61(13):3499-507. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq199. View

4.
Masuka B, Araus J, Das B, Sonder K, Cairns J . Phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012; 54(4):238-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01118.x. View

5.
Xu Z, Zhou G . Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59(12):3317-25. PMC: 2529243. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ern185. View