» Articles » PMID: 31071935

Livestock Stakeholder Willingness to Embrace Preslaughter Stunning in Key Asian Countries

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 May 11
PMID 31071935
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preslaughter stunning; the induction of unconsciousness and insensibility of animals prior to slaughter, is an important process for the welfare of livestock. The application of stunning is required by legislation in some countries, and rarely practised in others. In order to effectively advocate the implementation of stunning in the regions that do not include the practice as standard, it is first important to understand attitudes towards stunning, barriers to implementing stunning, and stakeholder willingness to embrace the practice. To this purpose, 17 focus group sessions were held with leaders in livestock production in China, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, India and Bangladesh. Leaders were asked to rate their perceived willingness of livestock stakeholders to embrace stunning, and their rationales were discussed. In addition to this, the leaders were asked to present ideas to improve the willingness of stakeholders to embrace stunning. The data were qualitatively analysed used thematic analysis, quantified, and presented within this manuscript. Importantly, different attitudes and solutions existed by country, mostly in line with the predominating religion within the country, and the stage of economic development. Concerns around nonstatic and constantly evolving animal welfare benchmarks were also presented as important factors impacting the adoption of stunning, and the technical methods used. The findings of this study may aid in the development of programs that aim to increase the adoption of preslaughter stunning practices, to the purpose of improving animal welfare during slaughter.

Citing Articles

The Effects of Preslaughter Electrical Stunning on Serum Cortisol and Meat Quality Parameters of a Slow-Growing Chinese Chicken Breed.

Li W, Yan C, Descovich K, Phillips C, Chen Y, Huang H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(20).

PMID: 36290252 PMC: 9598214. DOI: 10.3390/ani12202866.


Farm Animal Welfare Science in China-A Bibliometric Review of Chinese Literature.

Sinclair M, Zhang Y, Descovich K, Phillips C Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(3).

PMID: 32213957 PMC: 7142485. DOI: 10.3390/ani10030540.


Halal Criteria Versus Conventional Slaughter Technology.

Abdullah F, Borilova G, Steinhauserova I Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(8).

PMID: 31387323 PMC: 6718994. DOI: 10.3390/ani9080530.

References
1.
Fletcher D . Slaughter technology. Poult Sci. 1999; 78(2):277-81. DOI: 10.1093/ps/78.2.277. View

2.
Gibson T, Johnson C, Murrell J, Hulls C, Mitchinson S, Stafford K . Electroencephalographic responses of halothane - anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral-neck incision without prior stunning. N Z Vet J. 2009; 57(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2009.36882. View

3.
Gregory N, Fielding H, Wenzlawowicz M, von Holleben K . Time to collapse following slaughter without stunning in cattle. Meat Sci. 2010; 85(1):66-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.005. View

4.
Linares M, Bornez R, Vergara H . Effect of different stunning systems on meat quality of light lamb. Meat Sci. 2011; 76(4):675-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.007. View

5.
Gregory N . Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter. Meat Sci. 2011; 80(1):2-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019. View