Computational Study of Aortic Hemodynamics for Patients with an Abnormal Aortic Valve: The Importance of Secondary Flow at the Ascending Aorta Inlet

Overview

Journal APL Bioeng

Date 2019 May 10

PMID 31069298

Citations 17

Authors

S Pirola

O A Jarral

D P ORegan

G Asimakopoulos

J R ANDERSON

J R Pepper

T Athanasiou

X Y Xu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Blood flow in the aorta is helical, but most computational studies ignore the presence of secondary flow components at the ascending aorta (AAo) inlet. The aim of this study is to ascertain the importance of inlet boundary conditions (BCs) in computational analysis of flow patterns in the thoracic aorta based on patient-specific images, with a particular focus on patients with an abnormal aortic valve. Two cases were studied: one presenting a severe aortic valve stenosis and the other with a mechanical valve. For both aorta models, three inlet BCs were compared; these included the flat profile and 1D through-plane velocity and 3D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging derived velocity profiles, with the latter being used for benchmarking. Our results showed that peak and mean velocities at the proximal end of the ascending aorta were underestimated by up to 41% when the secondary flow components were neglected. The results for helical flow descriptors highlighted the strong influence of secondary velocities on the helical flow structure in the AAo. Differences in all wall shear stress (WSS)-derived indices were much more pronounced in the AAo and aortic arch (AA) than in the descending aorta (DAo). Overall, this study demonstrates that using 3D velocity profiles as inlet BC is essential for patient-specific analysis of hemodynamics and WSS in the AAo and AA in the presence of an abnormal aortic valve. However, predicted flow in the DAo is less sensitive to the secondary velocities imposed at the inlet; hence, the 1D through-plane profile could be a sufficient inlet BC for studies focusing on distal regions of the thoracic aorta.

Citing Articles

Hemodynamic effects of stenosis with varying severity in different segments of the carotid artery using computational fluid dynamics.

Yang J, Zhang Y, Xue J, Guo Y, Liu S, Yao Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4896.

PMID: 39929978 PMC: 11811151. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89100-2.

Characteristics of transition to turbulence in a healthy thoracic aorta using large eddy simulation.

Cheng K, Akhtar S, Lee K, Lee S, Lee S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3236.

PMID: 39863653 PMC: 11762701. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86983-z.

A comprehensive MRI-based computational model of blood flow in compliant aorta using radial basis function interpolation.

Perinajova R, van de Ven T, Roelse E, Xu F, Juffermans J, Westenberg J Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):69.

PMID: 39039565 PMC: 11265469. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01251-x.

Aneurysmal growth in type-B aortic dissection: assessing the impact of patient-specific inlet conditions on key haemodynamic indices.

Stokes C, Ahmed D, Lind N, Haupt F, Becker D, Hamilton J J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(206):20230281.

PMID: 37727072 PMC: 10509589. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0281.

Uncertainty Quantification in the In Vivo Image-Based Estimation of Local Elastic Properties of Vascular Walls.

Fanni B, Antonuccio M, Pizzuto A, Berti S, Santoro G, Celi S J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(3).

PMID: 36975873 PMC: 10058982. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10030109.

References

Lee A, Graham D, Dela Cruz S, Ratcliffe A, Karlon W . Fluid shear stress-induced alignment of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomech Eng. 2002; 124(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1115/1.1427697. View

Liu S, Tang D, Tieche C, Alkema P . Pattern formation of vascular smooth muscle cells subject to nonuniform fluid shear stress: mediation by gradient of cell density. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 285(3):H1072-80. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01009.2002. View

Jin S, Oshinski J, Giddens D . Effects of wall motion and compliance on flow patterns in the ascending aorta. J Biomech Eng. 2003; 125(3):347-54. DOI: 10.1115/1.1574332. View

Wentzel J, Corti R, Fayad Z, Wisdom P, Macaluso F, Winkelman M . Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45(6):846-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.026. View

Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Grigioni M, Redaelli A . Helical flow as fluid dynamic signature for atherogenesis risk in aortocoronary bypass. A numeric study. J Biomech. 2006; 40(3):519-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.017. View

Beller C, Labrosse M, Hagl S, Gebhard M, Karck M . Aortic root motion remodeling after aortic valve replacement--implications for late aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008; 7(3):407-11. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2007.166835. View

Humphrey J, Taylor C . Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008; 10:221-46. PMC: 2742216. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160439. View

Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Rizzo G, Cadioli M, Esposito A, De Cobelli F . In vivo quantification of helical blood flow in human aorta by time-resolved three-dimensional cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009; 37(3):516-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9609-6. View

Frydrychowicz A, Stalder A, Russe M, Bock J, Bauer S, Harloff A . Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 30(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21790. View

10.

Barker A, Lanning C, Shandas R . Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009; 38(3):788-800. PMC: 2872988. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9854-3. View

11.

Liu X, Fan Y, Deng X . Effect of spiral flow on the transport of oxygen in the aorta: a numerical study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009; 38(3):917-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9878-8. View

12.

Wen J, Zheng T, Jiang W, Deng X, Fan Y . A comparative study of helical-type and traditional-type artery bypass grafts: numerical simulation. ASAIO J. 2011; 57(5):399-406. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182246e0a. View

13.

Gallo D, De Santis G, Negri F, Tresoldi D, Ponzini R, Massai D . On the use of in vivo measured flow rates as boundary conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the human aorta: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 40(3):729-41. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0431-1. View

14.

Campbell I, Ries J, Dhawan S, Quyyumi A, Taylor W, Oshinski J . Effect of inlet velocity profiles on patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng. 2012; 134(5):051001. PMC: 3625536. DOI: 10.1115/1.4006681. View

15.

Van Doormaal M, Kazakidi A, Wylezinska M, Hunt A, Tremoleda J, Protti A . Haemodynamics in the mouse aortic arch computed from MRI-derived velocities at the aortic root. J R Soc Interface. 2012; 9(76):2834-44. PMC: 3479906. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0295. View

16.

Lin A, Lowe A, Sidhu K, Harrison W, Ruygrok P, Stewart R . Evaluation of a novel sphygmomanometer, which estimates central aortic blood pressure from analysis of brachial artery suprasystolic pressure waves. J Hypertens. 2012; 30(9):1743-50. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283567b94. View

17.

Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Gallo D, Bignardi C, Rizzo G . Inflow boundary conditions for image-based computational hemodynamics: impact of idealized versus measured velocity profiles in the human aorta. J Biomech. 2012; 46(1):102-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.012. View

18.

Hardman D, Semple S, Richards J, Hoskins P . Comparison of patient-specific inlet boundary conditions in the numerical modelling of blood flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm disease. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2012; 29(2):165-78. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2535. View

19.

Goubergrits L, Mevert R, Yevtushenko P, Schaller J, Kertzscher U, Meier S . The impact of MRI-based inflow for the hemodynamic evaluation of aortic coarctation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41(12):2575-87. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0879-2. View

20.

Entezari P, Schnell S, Mahadevia R, Malaisrie C, McCarthy P, Mendelson M . From unicuspid to quadricuspid: influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 40(6):1342-6. PMC: 4864037. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24498. View