» Articles » PMID: 31068662

Raptor Talon Shape and Biomechanical Performance Are Controlled by Relative Prey Size but Not by Allometry

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 May 10
PMID 31068662
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most birds of prey (raptors), rely heavily on their talons for capturing prey. However, the relationship between talon shape and the ability to take prey is poorly understood. In this study we investigate whether raptor talons have evolved primarily in response to adaptive pressures exerted by different dietary demands, or if talon morphology is largely constrained by allometric or phylogenetic factors. We focus on the hallux talon and include 21 species in total varying greatly in body mass and feeding ecology, ranging from active predation on relatively large prey to obligate scavenging. To quantify the variation in talon shape and biomechanical performance within a phylogenetic framework, we combined three dimensional (3D) geometric morphometrics, finite element modelling and phylogenetic comparative methods. Our results indicate that relative prey size plays a key role in shaping the raptorial talon. Species that hunt larger prey are characterised by both distinct talon shape and mechanical performance when compared to species that predate smaller prey, even when accounting for phylogeny. In contrast to previous results of skull-based analysis, allometry had no significant effect. In conclusion, we found that raptor talon evolution has been strongly influenced by relative prey size, but not allometry and, that talon shape and mechanical performance are good indicators of feeding ecology.

Citing Articles

Curving expectations: The minimal impact of structural curvature in biological puncture mechanics.

Zhang B, Baskota B, Chabain J, Anderson P Sci Adv. 2024; 10(33):eadp8157.

PMID: 39141731 PMC: 11323891. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adp8157.


Unexpectedly uneven distribution of functional trade-offs explains cranial morphological diversity in carnivores.

Sansalone G, Wroe S, Coates G, Attard M, Fruciano C Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3275.

PMID: 38627430 PMC: 11021405. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47620-x.


Quantitative investigation of pengornithid enantiornithine diet reveals macrocarnivorous ecology evolved in birds by Early Cretaceous.

Miller C, Pittman M, Wang X, Zheng X, Bright J iScience. 2023; 26(3):106211.

PMID: 36923002 PMC: 10009206. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106211.


Evolutionary allometry and ecological correlates of fang length evolution in vipers.

Holding M, Trevine V, Zinenko O, Strickland J, Rautsaw R, Mason A Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1982):20221132.

PMID: 36300520 PMC: 9449470. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1132.


Taking a stab at modelling canine tooth biomechanics in mammalian carnivores with beam theory and finite-element analysis.

Pollock T, Panagiotopoulou O, Hocking D, Evans A R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(10):220701.

PMID: 36300139 PMC: 9579775. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220701.


References
1.
Voje K, Hansen T, Egset C, Bolstad G, Pelabon C . Allometric constraints and the evolution of allometry. Evolution. 2013; 68(3):866-85. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12312. View

2.
Dececchi T, Larsson H . Assessing arboreal adaptations of bird antecedents: testing the ecological setting of the origin of the avian flight stroke. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e22292. PMC: 3153453. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022292. View

3.
Anderson P, Friedman M, Brazeau M, Rayfield E . Initial radiation of jaws demonstrated stability despite faunal and environmental change. Nature. 2011; 476(7359):206-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature10207. View

4.
Adams D, Collyer M . Permutation tests for phylogenetic comparative analyses of high-dimensional shape data: what you shuffle matters. Evolution. 2015; 69(3):823-9. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12596. View

5.
Felice R, Goswami A . Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 115(3):555-560. PMC: 5776993. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716437115. View