» Articles » PMID: 31063485

Using Fecal Microbiota As Biomarkers for Predictions of Performance in the Selective Breeding Process of Pedigree Broiler Breeders

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 May 8
PMID 31063485
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Much work has been dedicated to identifying members of the microbial gut community that have potential to augment the growth rate of agricultural animals including chickens. Here, we assessed any correlations between the fecal microbiome, a proxy for the gut microbiome, and feed efficiency or weight gain at the pedigree chicken level, the highest tier of the production process. Because selective breeding is conducted at the pedigree level, our aim was to determine if microbiome profiles could be used to predict feed conversion or weight gain in order to improve selective breeding. Using 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing, we profiled the microbiomes of high and low weight gain (WG) birds and good and poor feed efficient (FE) birds in two pedigree lineages of broiler chickens. We also aimed to understand the dynamics of the microbiome with respect to maturation. A time series experiment was conducted, where fecal samples of chickens were collected at 6 points of the rearing process and the microbiome of these samples profiled. We identified OTUs differences at different taxonomic levels in the fecal community between high and low performing birds within each genetic line, indicating a specificity of the microbial community profiles correlated to performance factors. Using machine-learning methods, we built a classification model that could predict feed conversion performance from the fecal microbial community. With respect to maturation, we found that the fecal microbiome is dynamic in early life but stabilizes after 3 weeks of age independent of lineage. Our results indicate that the fecal microbiome profile can be used to predict feed conversion, but not weight gain in these pedigree lines. From the time series experiments, it appears that these predictions can be evaluated as early as 20 days of age. Our data also indicates that there is a genetic factor for the microbiome profile.

Citing Articles

Effect of calf separation on gut microbiome and fecal metabolome of mother in the captive Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis).

Ur Rahman Shah S, Tang B, He D, Hao Y, Ahmad M, Nabi G Int Microbiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39532805 DOI: 10.1007/s10123-024-00613-8.


Detection and characterization of Campylobacter in air samples from poultry houses using shot-gun metagenomics - a pilot study.

Haverkamp T, Spilsberg B, Johannessen G, Torp M, Sekse C BMC Microbiol. 2024; 24(1):399.

PMID: 39385092 PMC: 11462905. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03563-3.


Host genetics and gut microbiota synergistically regulate feed utilization in egg-type chickens.

Zhang W, Lan F, Zhou Q, Gu S, Li X, Wen C J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024; 15(1):123.

PMID: 39245742 PMC: 11382517. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01076-7.


Physiological function of gut microbiota and metabolome on successful pregnancy and lactation in the captive Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis)†.

Ur Rahman Shah S, Tang B, He D, Hao Y, Nabi G, Wang C Biol Reprod. 2024; 111(6):1249-1261.

PMID: 39135547 PMC: 11647103. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioae123.


Effects of Traditional Chinese Herbal Feed Additive on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity and Intestinal Health of Laying Hens.

Liu B, Ma R, Yang Q, Yang Y, Fang Y, Sun Z Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37570319 PMC: 10417022. DOI: 10.3390/ani13152510.


References
1.
Guban J, Korver D, Allison G, Tannock G . Relationship of dietary antimicrobial drug administration with broiler performance, decreased population levels of Lactobacillus salivarius, and reduced bile salt deconjugation in the ileum of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2006; 85(12):2186-94. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.12.2186. View

2.
Bull M, Plummer N . Part 1: The Human Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease. Integr Med (Encinitas). 2016; 13(6):17-22. PMC: 4566439. View

3.
DeSantis T, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie E, Keller K . Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(7):5069-72. PMC: 1489311. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. View

4.
Stanley D, Geier M, Chen H, Hughes R, Moore R . Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences. BMC Microbiol. 2015; 15:51. PMC: 4403768. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0388-6. View

5.
Polansky O, Sekelova Z, Faldynova M, Sebkova A, Sisak F, Rychlik I . Important Metabolic Pathways and Biological Processes Expressed by Chicken Cecal Microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 82(5):1569-76. PMC: 4771310. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03473-15. View