» Articles » PMID: 31061037

Counterintuitive Results from Observational Data: a Case Study and Discussion

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 May 8
PMID 31061037
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the issue of counterintuitive data via analysis of a representative case in which the data obtained was unexpected and inconsistent with current knowledge. We then discuss the issue of counterintuitive data while developing a framework for approaching such findings.

Design: The case study is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. Regression was used to examine the association between perceived pain in the intensive care unit (ICU) and selected outcomes.

Setting: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III, a publicly available, de-identified critical care patient database.

Participants: 844 adult patients from the database who underwent CABG surgery and were extubated within 24 hours after ICU admission.

Outcomes: 30 day mortality, 1 year mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS).

Results: Increased pain levels were found to be significantly associated with reduced mortality at 30 days and 1 year, and shorter hospital LOS. A one-point increase in mean pain level was found to be associated with a reduction in the odds of 30 day and 1 year mortality by a factor of 0.457 (95% CI 0.304 to 0.687, p<0.01) and 0.710 (95% CI 0.571 to 0.881, p<0.01) respectively, and a 0.916 (95% CI -1.159 to -0.673, p<0.01) day decrease in hospital LOS.

Conclusion: The finding of an association between increased pain and improved outcomes was unexpected and clinically counterintuitive. In an increasingly digitised age of medical big data, such results are likely to become more common. The reliability of such counterintuitive results must be carefully examined. We suggest several issues to consider in this analytic process. If the data is determined to be valid, consideration must then be made towards alternative explanations for the counterintuitive results observed. Such results may in fact indicate that current clinical knowledge is incomplete or not have been firmly based on empirical evidence and function to inspire further research into the factors involved.

Citing Articles

Effect of heart rate on hospital mortality in critically ill patients may be modified by age: a retrospective observational study from large database.

Zhou D, Li Z, Shi G, Zhou J Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020; 33(5):1325-1335.

PMID: 32638341 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01644-7.

References
1.
Hine L, Laird N, Hewitt P, CHALMERS T . Meta-analytic evidence against prophylactic use of lidocaine in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1989; 149(12):2694-8. View

2.
Prasad V, Jena A . Prespecified falsification end points: can they validate true observational associations?. JAMA. 2013; 309(3):241-2. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.96867. View

3.
Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon K . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(3):292-298. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. View

4.
Bykowski M, Sivak W, Garland C, Cladis F, Goldstein J, Losee J . A Multimodal Preemptive Analgesic Protocol for Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery: Decreased Pain, Hospital Stay, and Health Care Costs. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018; 56(4):479-486. DOI: 10.1177/1055665618791943. View

5.
Connors Jr A, Speroff T, Dawson N, Thomas C, Harrell Jr F, Wagner D . The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA. 1996; 276(11):889-97. DOI: 10.1001/jama.276.11.889. View